|
[left.htm]
| |
Barry Chamish Newsletter Archives
November 22 - Sneh the Peacemaker.
November 21 - The Israeli Army Can't Win.
November 13 - Why the "Palestinians" Have No Right To
A State.
November 5 - What I Have To Put Up With.
November 2 - Peace of the Murderers.
November 22, 2000 - Sneh The Peacemaker
On Thursday night, Deputy Defence Minister Ephraim Sneh met with
Palestinian murderers at Erez Checkpoint in order to, "discuss ways to
contain the violence." So let's look at his role in the Rabin assassination.
Dr. Sneh, a physician who was then the Health Minister, was in
Rabin's
operating theatre and viewed the body. After doing so, he announced the
cause of death to the nation on television. He said, "Tonight in Tel Aviv,
as a result of incitement, at 11:10, the Prime Minister and Defence
Minister Yitzhak Rabin died. He was shot three times in the chest, stomach
and spinal cord."
Later that night, the State Pathologist, Dr. Yehuda Hiss, changed
Sneh's conclusions. Now Rabin was shot only twice and "there were no breaks
in the spinal cord." This is the conclusion adopted by the Shamgar
Commission of Inquiry because, Yigal Amir could not have caused the third
wound which shattered the spinal cord since he did not shoot Rabin three
times and this wound was from a frontal shot and Amir never shot from the
front. Further, all witnesses saw Rabin walk towards his car after the
shots were fired, an impossibility if his spinal cord was shattered.
For obvious reasons, Sneh was not asked by the Shamgar Commission
to
explain his official announcement to the people. But NBC didn't let him get
away with this deceit. He was asked by producers Jay Bushinsky and Linda
Goldman why he announced three bullets, one of which hit the spine and he
replied, "To discuss now what I said an hour after the assassination, I
think is, to say the least, unimportant."
Sure, two bullets, three, spinal cord injury or not, what's the
difference?
Sneh is an integral part of the Rabin murder coverup. He was the
Health Minister who told the nation the truth, then lied from then on. And
now he is conducting appeasement negotiations while the nation burns.
Must I repeat the obvious? If we are to save our sad country, it
will
be through the Rabin murder. If the truth had been allowed to escape
widely, we would not be seeing the spectacle of Dr. Sneh selling our soul
to the murderers.
November 21, 2000 - THE ISRAELI ARMY CAN'T WIN
On Wednesday evening, the Yesha Council will hold a mass rally in downtown Jerusalem under
the slogan, "Let The Israel Defence Forces (IDF) Win." It's not just an empty
slogan, devoid of anything but jingoism, it is also wrong. The IDF can't win because it
doesn't want to. But the Yesha Council is far too shallow to understand why.
Two weeks ago, one of the most decorated officers in the history of the IDF
visited my home. He wanted the full story of the Rabin assassination and wanted to
understand why the IDF was acting in such a cowardly and inefficient manner. He said he
was representing a group of officers who demanded answers immediately.
First, I gave him my Rabin murder evidence, which he understood without
me having to repeat a point twice. He knew, without question, that Shimon Peres had to
have been the organizer of the murder based on what he had seen. It didn't take long for
him to grasp that Rabin was desperately trying to get out of the "peace" process
and that was the primary motive for his murder. And he concluded on the spot that the
Israeli media were actively cooperating in the coverup by creating a false Rabin, one who
died at the hands of anti-peace inciters.
And because of that manufactured stigma, the Yesha Council has chosen a
non-inflammatory, meaningless slogan. They do not want to be branded "inciters"
by utilizing such words as "traitors," or phrases like, "Put The Oslo
Criminals On Trial." That, they concluded, after a successful five year media
brainwashing, could lead to another political assassination. So the Yesha Council
organizers are misleading their followers and allowing them to take the unwarranted blame
for Rabin's murder. And that permits Peres and his Shabak partners in murder, to control
the high moral ground.
Meanwhile, Israel is aflame and hasn't got long to live.
My visitor noted that the IDF officers who had advanced the farthest,
were the most incompetent. And he had witnessed these men in action. "Rabin," he
recalled, "was a disaster in the field but he was an excellent administrator who
built a superb fighting force. But people like Lipkin-Shahak and Barak were cowardly in
battle and rotten administrators. Why were they the ones chosen to force this peace with
the PLO on us?"
I took a chance and gave him the full global picture. I began easy with
Prof. Uri Milshtein's books on the history of the IDF, proving that from the beginning,
the worst, most scandal-ridden officers were advanced and later entered high politics,
while it was the most courageous men who remained enmired in the middle ranks.
Then I gave him the deep story and he understood it as quickly as he
caught on to the real Rabin assassination. It begins early in the century when some really
nasty British and American robber barons were informed of the vast oil wealth beneath the
sands of the Middle East. British Petroleum and the Rothschild family felt a Jewish state
loyal to Britain would be a stable base to ensure control of the region. A major
motivation for World War One was Britain's desire to take over the richest oil fields and
for that purpose, diverted over a million badly needed troops from the European front, to
drive the Ottomans out of the land.
So the British, with the great help of their provocateur T.E.
Lawrence, armed two Arabian tribes to oust another ally, the Hussein clan from the
oil-rich lands of Arabia, and as a sop, moved the Husseins north to Jordan and Iraq to
rule foreign, artificially-created nations. Thus, the British won control of the Saudi oil
fields through their puppets, the Ibn Saud and Wahabi tribes.
But back in America, a few really nasty families, notably the
Rockefellers but later the Bushes, wanted the oil just as badly. So they used their wealth
to arm and bribe tribes on the Persian Gulf and thus created their own kingdoms with their
personal choice of royalty. While Rockefeller's Standard Oil took control of the Gulf's
riches, they spread the wealth to their equally nasty allies, like the Bushes, who created
the Kuwaiti oil industry for the Al Sabah tribe.
The British and Rockefeller clan both understood that to maintain
control and vastly increase the value of their properties, they needed a powerful
political organization behind them. So in 1911, two British imperialists, Cecil Rhodes and
Lord Milner founded their Round Table, which by 1920, became the Royal Institute For
International Affairs, to protect Anglo Saxon interests. Two years later, the Rockefellers
pooled their money with that of the J.P. Morgans and founded the Council On Foreign
Relations (CFR) for the same purposes, which included the ultimate formation of a one
world government run by, guess who, themselves. To promote their cause, they placed their
well-paid, unscrupulous adherents in the top levels of government, academia and the media.
The British ruled Palestine the same way they maintained control
throughout the empire. They chose the least ethical quislings to run the colonial
governments, beginning with David Ben Gurion and Chaim Weizmann. Both did the dirtiest
work for the British, including rounding up and imprisoning those Jews who had figured out
what was going on, the most famous being Menachem Begin. So with Rothschild money and
British support, a Jewish state was aborning.
However, in the early 1930s, the Round Table/CFR Arab
puppets began rebelling against the Jews in their midst and they now had the muscle to
influence their masters. You see, the Rockefellers were avoiding paying American taxes by
a quirky law they arranged, which replaced American taxes with "allotments" paid
to their corrupted oil sheikhs. While Standard Oil was ripping off Americans at the gas
lines and funneling billions into its CFR, the sheikhs had the power to blow the whistle
on them and end the scam.
Well aware of their precarious position, the Round Table/CFR gang
tried to put an end to the emerging Israel by cutting off immigration. The plan was
working well, thanks to the cooperation of Ben Gurion at the beginning, but even he woke
up to the fact that his bosses were betraying him. And he finally, almost too late, joined
in the rebellion against the British, as far as he could go without endangering his own
existence. It was a delicate balancing act. He gave as much as he could, which will turn
out to be too much, while trying to preserve his nation.
The end of World War 2 brought worldwide guilt-ridden support for
the new state of Israel, as well as a doubling of its population. The Arabs felt betrayed
and unsuccessfully attacked Israel. After the first failure, the Royal Institute/CFR
diplomats promised their sheikhs that they would wear Israel down until it disappeared.
The first step was the corruption of the IDF. Ben Gurion was
ordered to advance his weakest officers and prepare them for public service. He realized
the longterm plan and as usual, compromised. Thus utterly inappropriate officers like the
unabashed antiquities thief Moshe Dayan and Yitzhak Rabin, the shooter of the helpless men
swimming away from the burning ship, the Altalena, rose to the highest military and
political ranks and once there, appointed the same kind of weaklings to further high
posts.
These men owed their power to the CFR, which continued to
finance and groom their rising careers. It is no different with Ehud Barak, Ariel Sharon,
Amnon Lipkin-Shahak et al. They were all bought and have debts to repay the CFR. Rabin
bravely reneged on his debts and was murdered for it. Barak knows he has to play ball by
their rules or he will suffer the same fate.
So he will never let the IDF win and the Yesha Council is
deluding its followers.
However, something new is happening in Israel; the
middle-level officers are beginning to grumble and plot. I lecture several times a week
and at the end of each evening, there are always people with inside information who want
to talk to me. One IDF officer told me, "We all know what has to be done. The PA has
to be utterly cut off; no power, fuel, food or anything let in until they turn their guns
over to us. The world will be riled up to condemn us no matter what we do and its either
an embargo or near carpet bombing. Barak has chosen to avenge brutal murders with rocket
attacks on empty buildings. That strategy will bleed us to death. If he doesn't act, there
may be a rebellion from the middle in the IDF."
And still, believing the IDF is too loyal to rebel, Barak will
not upset his masters by actually defending his country. So the Yesha Council is wasting
its breath and everybody's time.
If its members really want to preserve their own existences and
that of the Jewish State, they would be far better off organizing a massive rally to
reinvestigate the Rabin murder. That would be worth a million of their current fruitless
demonstrations.
November 13, 2000 - WHY THE
"PALESTINIANS" HAVE NO RIGHT TO A STATE
There was so much to tell this week. The death of Leah Rabin a year after
she publicly demanded a reinvestigation of her husband's murder. The
suspicious silence of her two children this year about their father's equally
suspicious demise. The dragging out of a beaten, drugged, threatened Yigal
Amir to once again confess before the cameras of Channel Two. The use of
Channel Two hostess Ilana Dayan as a conduit of disinformation for the
Shabak.
And then there was the truth that the media exposed. Hatsofe tore apart the
lies in Carmi Gillon's book and wrote that he was covering up his own
crimes. The same Hatsofe finally publishing suspicions of Shimon Peres'
involvement in Rabin's murder. Tel Aviv Magazine's interview with Eyal
Shomroni Cohen, the recently fired attorney for the Shabak provocateur
Avishai Raviv, revealing that he had seen the cut 30 seconds of the
assassination film and what it revealed, "would shock the nation." Yoav
Yitzhaki in Maariv
exposing the collaboration between the police, prosecution and Channel
One in the destruction of the incriminating Avishai Raviv initiation ceremony
film. Marriv's Ratings Magazine exposing Israeli television's coverup of the
Rabin murder conspiracy...and more.
But all that has been swept under the carpet by the PLO's murders of
innocents.
Two weeks ago, the respected political site Rumors Of War asked me to
begin an on-line debate with Arab analysts. I never debate Arabs because I
feel their point of view on all matters relevant to me is baseless and
prejudiced. I agreed to begin such a debate if I could choose the topic; one,
which for once, an Israeli doesn't have to begin with on the defensive. My
subject for debate was, Do The Palestinians Deserve A State? After two
weeks, no one has bothered to join in the debate. So here are the major
points which were never discussed on Rumors Of War:
There was never an independent Arab state called Palestine. At best,
Palestine was a backwoods Turkish province. Hence, there were no
pilgrimages to the "holy" Al Aqsa mosque. Jerusalem is not the third
holiest site of Islam. Mecca and Medina are holy, Jerusalem was never
mentioned in the same breath until the liberation of the Temple Mount by
the Israelis in 1967.
The Palestinians and their political leadership bring war and instability to
wherever theyreside, be it Jordan, Lebanon or in the very territories
Israel recently handed
over to them. No one wants them as neighbors because they are too egotistical,
hotheaded, selfish and immature o qualify as a responsible nation.
And no one would sign a meaningful agreement with any
Palestinian
leader because agreements are always broken. Israel learned the hard way,
that the PLO's diplomats have no ethics and lie with impunity. They will
always be diplomats of a terror organization, never of a nation, because
nations must abide by their commitments.
There is no hope of the Palestinians ever honestly electing their
leaders.
At best, this ragtag collection of Middle Eastern peoples will accept
whatever tyrant proves the most inscrutable and leads their tribe after
Arafat.
The Palestinians send their children to their deaths to make
media
propaganda points. Real nations care about their young. The PLO and its
allied Islamic organizations practise child sacrifice under the guise of
martyrdom.
The PLO has no morals, national or otherwise. Their sole
motivation
is to
instill hate from one generation to the next.
The PLO has brought nothing but misery to its followers.
The
Palestinians
know nothing of the creation of beauty, engage in no serious scholarship,
pass nothing of greatness down the ages. Their legacy is purely of
destruction.
The Palestinian leaders and their factotums are
totally corrupt,
stealing
every penny of public money they can lay their hands on. No one seriously
accepts that financial aid will actually reach the people. And no one will
make a business investment in the Palestinians because of the payoffs and
bribes involved in setting up shop. And for what? A business that will be
shut down or destroyed by terrorism and civil war? The PLO's strongarm
tactics have brought in just enough protection money to buy arms and pay
the militias, but not enough honest funds to initiate a prosperous nation.
The PLO and its police torture people they don't like. They
execute
people without due process of law. Whatever Palestinian courts do exist,
none do so to protect the rights of the accused.
The PLO will not tolerate free expression and arrest and
torture
journalists who criticize the regime.
The PLO offer no rights to women. Only among its
followers in the
Christian community, can women receive higher education and responsible
jobs.
There is no Palestinian language.
There is no Palestinian religion.
Jerusalem is never mentioned in the Koran.
Mohammed never claimed he was in Jerusalem.
The Al Aqsa Mosque and Shrine Of Omar are built atop the ancient Jewish
temples.
The Jews held sovereignty over Jerusalem for 1300 years; the Arabs, a mere
fraction of the time.
There was never an Arab Palestinian nationalist movement until 1964.
The majority of "Palestinians" according to British demographic surveys,
arrived in Israel after 1917, seeking economic opportunities.
No one is offering to compensate the 800,000 Sephardic Jews whose
assets were stolen when they were forced out of Arab countries in the 40s
and 50s.
Israel took in their refugees, the Arabs kept their 500,000 in camps.
The Palestinians already have a nation, Jordan. There, the indigenous
majority is ruled by Bedouin royalty from Mecca. The Jordanians had control
of the West Bank from 1948 to 1967 and never once offered it
as a Palestinian state. Why not? The Egyptians held the Gaza Strip for much
longer. Why didn't they create a Palestinian state if there were
Palestinian people living there?
There is no ancient Palestinian history. There are no world renowned
Palestinian artists, scientists, not one Palestinian
literary masterpiece, no recognizable culture, no inventions...
nothing that distinguishes Palestinians as a people.
They are neither a unique people, nor a separate people with their own
history. The Palestinians do not deserve a nation because they are not a
nation. Period.
November 5, 2000 - What I Have To Put Up With
Last Friday, Maariv's weekend magazine published a three page interview with Dr. Mordechai
Gutman, Yitzhak Rabin's last chief surgeon. On the cover of the magazine was a photo of
Gutman walking and a banner headline, "There Was No Third Bullet." I was
ecstatic. The second biggest newspaper in Israel felt compelled on the fifth anniversary
of Rabin's murder to answer my main contention: that Rabin was shot three times, once
frontally, not twice in the back as our government insisted. The implication, of course,
is that Yigal Amir never shot Rabin three times nor from the front. My work was having the
impact I long fought for and desired.
Two journalists who received advance copies of the article were equally
excited. "Gutman," said one, "is in for it. Everyone will spot his
lies." And when I finally read the article, I discovered that Dr. Gutman didn't let
me down. Not at all. In fact, I was thoroughly delighted by his disastrous presentation.
Here is the letter I wrote to Maariv:
"Dr. Gutman tries desperately to prove, "There Was No
Third Bullet," because no third bullet ever exited Rabin's body.
"Whoever claimed that one did? Certainly not me or my
colleagues. We simply repeat Dr. Gutman's surgical notes which report that a bullet
"passed through the upper lobe of the right lung, leaving a 3 cm. wound exit wound in
the lung before continuing to vertebrae D5-6, then shattering them."
"Dr. Gutman is posing his own contradictions, then answering
them. Further, he claims that this wound description was a case of mistaken inscription.
If so, then he made the same mistake three times in one night, for he describes precisely
the same wound in his Surgical Wound and Operation Summary.
"Dr. Gutman seems to forget that seven other doctors and
nurses, including Health Minister Ephraim Sneh and Ichilov Hospital Director Gaby Barabash
also reported the same third frontal wound that night. On top of that, Shimon Peres in a
PBS interview says that he saw Rabin's body and it was wounded three times including once
from a frontal shot that passed through the song sheet Rabin put in his front jacket
pocket.
"So who is telling the truth, Sneh, Barabah, Peres et al or
Gutman?
"And what are we supposed to say about Dr. Gutman and all the
other doctors reporting that Rabin died of spinal shock, a shattering of the spinal cord,
from this third shot? How do we explain that the State Pathologist concluded that there
"was no damage to the spinal cord," or that the Shamgar Commission Of Inquiry
chose to accept that conclusion over that of five other doctors, including Gutman himself?
"Gutman simply does not bring up this central of all issues in his
interview.
"And how do we account for his lies? He says that the disputed
section of the surgeon's report was taken out of context from a three page report. I have
the full report and it is six pages long. And nothing is taken out of context. Dr. Gutman
reports treating two other wounds and then describes his treatment of the third, frontal
wound.
"The Rabin assassination must be reinvestigated and if Dr. Gutman
is found to be lying, as I insist he is, then steps must be taken towards his permanent
disbarment from the medical profession."
Today I received several phone calls and letters claiming someone was
spreading a rumor that the Maariv article somehow discredited me. I was dumbfounded. For
the past two days my phone hasn't stopped ringing. People throughout Israel read the
interview and saw it as a major breakthrough. They knew the facts of the Rabin murder and
saw right through Dr. Gutman's deceit. Clearly, I had underestimated the stupidity of the
rest of the country.
Then I received a phone call from New York telling me the rumor monger was
one Stephen Plut. "Not him again," I thought. This man has a sick obsession with
my work that is hard to explain unless he is doing someone's dirty work. I've never met
him so I called a colleague of his to find out why I have this scandal monger on my back.
He told me, "We worked together every now and then back in the late
'80s. We were both committed to bringing a free market economy to Israel. He prepared a
paper that was recognized in some economic circles and wrote regularly for the Jerusalem
Post.
"He has long since been axed from the Post and faded into obscurity. He
tries to make up for his fall from grace by writing from a 1970s conservative angle, you
know, satires about feminism and the like, but he hasn't the talent to gain a following.
"He might actually be working for some agency but I think you're
looking at a frustrated mediocrity, long ago left behind. You're the new wave and he's too
shallow to understand why. While you are having books published worldwide, he is seething
about a world which won't recognize his self-perceived greatness. Ignore him, he's not
important to you or anybody."
Tonight, I hosted a high ranking military figure in my home. He
heard my conversation from New York and added, "You know what the discrediters can't
figure out? The more they attack you, the better your work gets known. They can't figure
out that neglect is your greatest enemy."
November 2, 2000 - PEACE OF THE MURDERERS
Yesterday evening, Shimon Peres met Yasir "Mad Dog" Arafat in Gaza
and, lo and behold, miracle of miracles, they agreed to make peace again.
At least, that's how the world media is reporting the meeting. Now here is
what really happened.
The New World Order's hardcore agents in the Israeli
cabinet, Peres
and Yossi Beilin are threatening Prime Minister Barak and he knows they
mean business. He is terrified, not of them so much, as of the foreign
troublemakers are representing. Barak was placed in power by the Council On
Foreign Relations and is owned by the Anglo-Saxons. He has debts to repay
and, for a couple of more months anyway, he must obey Clinton. Come
January, the next CFR President and his CFR Secretary Of State, will take
over where Clinton and Albright left off.
Peres, on the other hand, is beholden to the Europeans and
they want
their piece of the peace. So, German Chancellor Shroeder showed up in Gaza
yesterday morning and ordered Arafat to meet with Peres.
The Peres meeting with Arafat was arranged by:
Yossi Ginosar - Former Deputy Shabak (General
Security Services)
chief, who became enmired in scandal in the 80s when he lied about the
execution of two PLO murderers in what is known as the Bus 300 Scandal and
later was forced to resign when it was exposed that his perjured testimony
sent an innocent army officer to a long prison term. He and Arafat share a
major business interest, both skimming from the profits of the Oasis
Casino, near Jericho.
Carmi Gillon - While Shabak chief, he oversaw a
long string of
deadly scam operations, including the Hebron massacre of February, 1994,
and the Rabin assassination, as part of a policy to promote peace by
isolating and demonising those opposed to it. It was his duty to remove the
Jewish residents of Judea and Samaria from their homes, in order to fulfill
secret promises to the PLO to acquire 100% of the territory known to many
as the West Bank.
Another of the promises Peres made, as fully documented in
my
previous work, was to remove Israeli sovereignty over the Old City and East
Jerusalem. He made a vow to the Europeans that the UN would take over
security of Jerusalem, while the Vatican would become guardians of the holy
sites. Once Israeli hegemony passed to the UN, it would grant the PLO the
right to establish its capital in the parts of the city it controlled. The
current war is being fought because neither the CFR, thus, nor Barak, want
the Vatican deal to go through and Arafat feels cheated.
Peres must live up to his bargain for the fighting to stop.
And Barak
knows it. He also knows Clinton's gang is opposed to Peres' handover of
Jerusalem to the Europeans. Now let us add two more murderers to the peace
ingredients.
Peres - My new editions of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin, just
published
in English and German, prove Peres organized the Rabin assassination in
concert with French intelligence. Those who know my work are aware that I
proved this contention well. Those who don't...get the book.
Clinton - Serial murderer. Victims include Vince Foster,
Jerry Parks,
Sonny Bono, Ron Brown, William Colby and on and on for at least 150 names.
It is most unwise to cross this fellow or know too many facts that he
regards as embarrassing to him.
Now add the mass murderer Yasir Arafat, who has killed tens
of
thousands in Israel, Jordan and Lebabon, for starters, and you've got a
peace of the murderers. Which is why Jews and Arabs by the dozens are dying
every week for it. And which is why the dying will continue because last
night Peres assured Arafat that he will squeeze Barak and the Israeli
government to live up to his promises. The Europeans and UN will join in on
the final "peace" negotiations. The UN will send their "peacekeepers"
to
Jerusalem and they will hand the PLO its capital there. And if Barak
doesn't go along, well, he knows what happened to Rabin when he stopped
cooperating with Peres.
There is a tiny glimmer of hope. In two days, we will
be forced the
commemorate the fifth anniversary of the Rabin assassination with a massive
government and media propaganda campaign. However, I received three phone
calls from respected journalists which suggest the campaign is in trouble.
Yuval Natan and Yaacov Werker called this morning in great excitement. They
received advance copies of the weekend Maariv newspaper. Within is a long
interview with Dr. Mordechai Gutman, Rabin's last chief surgeon. Central to
my thesis of a conspiracy to murder Rabin is the fact that the government
insists Rabin was shot twice in the back, while Gutman's notes state that
he was shot three times, and once from the front. Maariv makes much of my
contention in the interview.
Says Natan, an editor of a Maariv magazine, "No one is
going to
believe Gutman. He sounds like he's being stage-managed and it comes
through too clearly."
Adds Werker, "You won't believe how much he trips up.
He actually
says Rabin was shot twice in the chest. As much as he's trying not to, he
is confirming all your claims."
And the third journalist, Adir Zik informs me that in
tomorrow's
edition of Hatsofe, for the first time in Hebrew print, suspicions of a
Peres' role in Rabin's murder will be published.
Alive, Rabin got Israel into this murderous mess. Dead, he
may get us
out of it. He will do so by permanently eliminating Peres and Beilin from
the Israeli political arena.
|