|
[left.htm]
| |
Barry Chamish Newsletter Archives
January 30 - Avi Dichter: Head of the Shabak and
Part-Time Crap Salesman.
January 27 - Why the PLO is Tunneling Under the Temple Mount.
January 17 - The Vatican's Plot Against Israel.
January 9 - What About Those Trips and How About That CFR?
January 4 - Two Sites.
January 2 - Conference Traps Gillon.
January 30, 2001 - AVI DICHTER- HEAD OF THE SHABAK
AND PART-TIME CRAP SALESMAN
Thirty days after the murder of Binyamin Kahane and his wife
Talya,
the chief of Israel's General Security Services (Shabak) spent the sabbath
with the deceased couple's family. His mission was to unload an unwanted
supply of rotting crap. But before describing his weekend, let us examine
some classic cases of successful crap sales.
In November 1, 1990 Binyamin's father, Rabbi Meir Kahane's speech
in
New Work was interrupted by lethal gunfire. The shooter, an Arab named
Nosair was a trained assassin. He felled the rabbi from a distance of sixty
feet with small arms. He raced outside where a postman, who just happened
to be wearing a bullet-proof vest, was supposed to kill him as he fled. But
Nosair shot first and saved himself.
Later it was discovered that Nosair somehow arrived in the US
without
a passport. And somehow he joined an Islamic cell in New Jersey run by a
blind Egyptian cleric who would later order the bombing of the World Trade
Center.
This cell was infiltrated by an Arab who later moved to Israel
for his
own protection. He met with Binyamin Kahane and signed an affidavit for him
declaring that he had reported the upcoming hit on Rabbi Meir Kahane to his
contacts in the FBI and Mossad. They did nothing to stop the murder. And
later, they intervened in the courts to prevent Nosair from being convicted
of Rabbi Kahane's murder.
The Israeli and world media reported that Rabbi Kahane was
murdered by
a radical Arab. That was crap. Meir Kahane was a political threat to, more
than anyone else, the Likud Party and its leader, then-Prime Minister
Yitzhak Shamir. While the Left despised him for his fiery opposition to
their delusions, the Right feared him for luring away, according to all the
polls, at least 20% of their voters. He was assassinated in a covert
intelligence operation and that is the truth.
In the Spring of 2000, the Israeli Ambassador to France, Eliyahu
Ben
Elissar, got wind of the truth behind the Rabin assassination and the
collusion of France in the murder. French intelligence operatives told him
that Shimon Peres cut a deal with the French. They authorized Rabin's
removal and in return his successor Shimon Peres signed an agreement for a
French-approved peace deal. The UN would take over security of Jerusalem's
Old City, they would grant the PLO a capital there and the Vatican would
become sovereign over the holy places within. Ben Elissar was determined to
warn his people and that the French authorities would not allow.
Prime Minister Barak was called to Paris and met with Ben Elissar
and
Jacques Chirac. Ben Elissar was warned in the frankest language not to
intervene to save his nation. He did not comply. Barak returned to Israel
knowing what the French would do to his ambassador and tried his best to
save him.
To make Ben Elissar's recall to Jerusalem more logical, Barak
recalled
a total of six Foreign Ministry workers and spread the word that he was
firing appointees of his renegade Foreign Minister David Levy. Seeing that
Ben Elissar was packing his bags, the French hit team went into action.
They removed Ben Elissar's Paris police guards and by whatever
means,
had his Israeli Shabak bodyguards abandon him as well. Alone, late Sabbath
morning, Ben Elissar went to his embassy's small hotel to meet two men. He
clearly thought this meeting was vital enough to interrupt his normally
quiet
day of rest.
The three of them went to a room. Ben Elissar was overcome,
stripped
naked and tied to the bed. A needle with an air bubble was injected into
him and when the empty pocket of blood reached his heart he suffered a
cardiac arrest.
The Israeli media was leaked a lurid tale of Ben Elissar spending
his
last morning in the company of two male prostitutes and of having a heart
attack while engaged in a sadomasochistic orgy. And the media dutifully
spread the crap. It never occurred to them that a man of Ben Elissar's
stature and intelligence would never have shown up in the embassy's hotel
where everyone knew him, with two homosexual call boys.
This morning I received a call from America from a gentleman who
worked in the same department as Ben Elissar when he was the ambassador to
Washington. His wife worked with him personally. She was informed that
American intelligence had conclusively proved that Ben Elissar's death was
a murder. In Israel, the crap story continues to rule.
Thirty three days ago Binyamin Kahane, his wife and three
children
returned from Jerusalem to their home in Kfar Tapuah. No doubt his mood was
fine because he was having a resurgence. After his father's death, he
abandoned his political party Kach because it was thoroughly infiltrated by
the Shabak and assembled an alternative movement called Kahane Chai.
The Arab uprising begun three months previously had convinced
tens of
thousands of Israelis to openly proclaim that his father's philosophy was
being proven prophetic. They spread stickers everywhere reading,"Kahane Was
Right."
This, however, wasn't what really worried the authorities in
Israel.
What got their ire were those hundreds of thousands of Israelis who
thought, "Okay, Kahane went too far and he was an extremist. But, he was
right about some things." To prevent that bud from blossoming, Israel
Police had recently shut down Binyamin Kahane's yeshiva. But the stubborn
bud threatened to flower, so it had to be removed from the stalk.
Binyamin Kahane's killers waited from just 60 meter's range,
audaciously close. They pumped 62 bullets into his vehicle. Please find
another example of "random terrorism" where the shooters were so determined
to fell their quarry that they pumped 62 bullets into his car. There aren't
any. This was a hit and by skilled hitmen. Their bullets only landed in the
front seat. Not one bullet even scratched the children sitting in the rear.
They were wounded by shattered glass and the car accident which followed.
The Israeli media tried selling their usual crap but this time
people
too many people decided not to buy it. So the Shabak sent its chief to
unload the refuse in person. Read the following press release from Kahane's
organization:
>update..update..update..exclusive...update...exclusive
>
>GSS ADMITS: "KAHANE MURDERERS STILL FREE" AND DENIES SHIN BET INVOLVMENT
>IN MURDER
>
>GSS head Avi Dichter met with family members of the late Binyamin and
>Talia Kahane today, and informed them that the murderers of the couple -
>parents of six orphans under the age of 11 - have been apprehended.
>Dichter confirmed that the terrorist murderers were members of Yasser
>Arafat's Presidential Guard. The cell, most of whose members are also
>part of Arafat's Force 17, murdered seven Jews over the past three months:
>Sarah Lisha and the soldiers Elad Veinshtein and Amit Zana - all in a
>two-pronged attack between Ofrah and Shilo; Ariel Jerafi east of Tapuach;
>Eliyahu Cohen on the Modi'in highway, and Binyamin and Talya Kahane
>outside Ofrah. This cell is apparently also responsible for many of the
>recent shooting attacks in northern Jerusalem.
>
>However, when Dichter and the other GSS heads were confronted by the
>Kahane family and asked if indeed those apprehended were the ones who
>pulled the trigger in the murder of Binyamin and Talia Kahane, Dichter
>conceded that the actual murderers were not yet apprehended.
>
>Dichter then offered the real reason for his visit. The GSS
>representatives expressed their concern over the dissemination of
>conspiracy theories connected to the murder of Binyamin and Talia Kahane.
>Specific reference was made to the conspiracy theories that blamed the
>government for former Prime Minister Rabin's assassination and asked the
>Kahane family to accept their denial of any government participation in
>the plot to kill Binyamin and Talia Kahane. "We had nothing to do with
>their murder", insisted Dichter.
>
>David HaIvri, the husband of Molly, who is Talia's sister told the GSS, "I
>personally did not suspect a conspiracy, however, many of the Kahane
>supporters believe that the Israeli government may have played a role.
>After all, you persecuted him and killed him so many times while he was
>alive, people see it as more than a coincidence that Kahane was arrested
>and his offices closed by the government only weeks before his murder.
>Everybody knows how hard you tried to silence and bury him."
On the day Binyamin and Talya Kahane were murdered, I told my readers
that the hitmen were from Arafat's own force. Look who got it right. The
day before Dichter's visit, the Israeli media proudly announced that the
murderers of the Kahanes were captured. This was crap and Dichter was
forced to admit it.
So why did Dichter make his journey to the lair of the Kahanes? Because
all the crap is coming out, starting with government involvement in the
Rabin assassination, and the Shabak is panicking. The vicious attack on the
Kahanes was one murder too far and this time there will be no nipping the
truth in the bud. Too many people are finally seeing through the crap.
end
The Second Edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin can he had by
writing brooklinebks@delphi.com. In
Israel write perkins@netvision.net.il.
The Last Days Of Israel is available in Israel from the same address or by
writing cadler@mindspring.com
elsewhere. Both books are available over
Amazon or Barnes And Noble.
Please visit http://www.webseers.com/rabin
January 27, 2001 - WHY THE PLO IS TUNNELING UNDER
THE TEMPLE MOUNT
The following is a brief extract from very long article I completed for
Fate Magazine. I wish I could send the full text but I have a hard copy
career to preserve. Nonetheless, in light of the revelation that the PLO is
tunneling under the Holy Mount, I'd like to give my faithful readers at
least a clue as to why.
Let us begin with a compelling history of the Knights Templar
written
by two Freemasons, Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, called The Second
Messiah. Summarized is their history of the organization:
The Templars were a poor chivalric order which disdained materialism
until their arrival in Jerusalem in the early twelfth century on a papal
crusade. Eleven knights dug under the ruins of Solomon's Temple for nine
years and hit paydirt. Under the Temple Mount the Templars discovered a
network of tunnels where the Jewish priests hid their treasures from the
marauding Romans in 70 AD. The knights not only uncovered some of the gold
and silver described in the Copper Scroll of the Dead Sea Scrolls but the
records of the first Jerusalem church of Christianity. This according to
Knight and Lomas is precisely what they went digging for.
The first Bishop of the Jerusalem Church was Jesus' brother James. He
was aided by Jesus' other siblings, five brothers and two sisters. After
the Romans destroyed Jerusalem and dispersed the Jews, James and his family
fled to France, a fact confirmed by the bestselling book Holy Blood, Holy
Grail. These descendants of the holy Davidic line had the wherewithal to
gain wealth throughout Europe and buy vast properties. Over time they
constituted a good chunk of European royalty.
While professing whatever religion the state demanded, first
worshiping the pantheon of Roman Gods and later papal Christianity, they
secretly practised the Christianity of the early Jerusalem church. These
descendants of the priestly line, now called themselves Rex Deus, and
passed on their traditions throughout the royal courts of Europe where they
ruled. The original Celt church was founded by the Rex Deus, and St.
Patrick of Ireland was a Jew. Other Rex Deus included the Habsburgs, the
Stuarts of Scotland and today's King Juan Carlos of Spain, who includes
among his titles, Protector Of The Holy Places Of Jerusalem.
The Templars returned from their Crusade with vast wealth
uncovered
under the Temple Mount and initiated a monumental building program in
Europe, which ultimately resulted in the construction of over 250 castles
and Gothic churches. They now challenged the papacy for political control
of Europe, yet the usually jealous Vatican allowed their power to grow
unabated. Knight and Lomas insist this is because the Templars had a huge
advantage over Rome.
According to their version of events, the Knights uncovered the
original records of the Jerusalem Church and they proved that the Vatican
was not practising Christianity as its founders intended. For example, a
pope with exclusive rights of divine interpretation was not part of G-d's
plan. If the scrolls were made public, they would jeopardize Rome's legitimacy.
In the fourteenth century, the French king known as Philip the
Fair
coordinated a purge of the Templars in coordination with the Holy See.
Their properties were seized and their leader, in fact the last Templar
leader, Jacques de Molay was brutally tortured by crucifixion until he
confessed to the alleged sins of his Order. He survived the first round of
torture and a linen cloth was placed over him to absorb his blood and keep
him warm. This cloth became known as the Shroud of Turin and the authors
arguments for this claim are superbly grounded in fact.
A group of Templars led by the St. Clair clan escaped the
French
siege by ship and landed in Scotland, a safe port since it was ruled by the
Rex Deus member, Robert the Bruce. It must be noted that at his death,
Robert the Bruce's heart was transported to Jerusalem for burial. Two
versions of what happened to it exist. The first says the deliverers of the
heart were captured in Spain, the second insists they made it and the heart
lays buried in Jerusalem to this day.
According to Knight and Lomas, the French Templars brought with
them
the damning scrolls from under the Jerusalem Temple Mount and built a
chapel in Rosslyn, near Edinburgh to house them. The chapel, built by
William Sinclair (1415- 1482), which exists today, was built according to
the specifications of the Herodian Temple and an exact duplicate of the
Western Wall was constructed alongside it. To hide their now-banned Templar
roots, the Knights formed a new organization, Freemasonry, whose rites were
precisely those set down in the scrolls recovered from beneath Jerusalem's
Temple Mount.
Scottish rite Masonry spread throughout Europe and according to Knight
and Lomas, much to the chagrin of the Vatican. In their version of events,
in 1717, the pro-Catholic Hanoverian dynasty took over the British crown
and ordered vast changes in Masonic rites. The 33 Scottish degrees were
reduced to just four in the new English rites and all the secrets within
the Jerusalem scrolls were eliminated from lodge ceremonies.
However, other writers share a different version of events,
insisting
the Templars and the Vatican remained partners throughout their public
trials. F. Tupper Saussy in his excellent book, Rulers Of Evil writes:
"On March 22, 1312, Clement V dissolved the Knights Templar
with his
decree Vox clamantis. But the dissolution proved a mere formality to
further appease Philip (the Fair). More importantly, it permitted the
Templars, in other manifestations to continue enriching the papacy...A
subtle provision in Vox clamantis transferred most Templar estates to the
Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. In Germany and Austria, the Templars
became "Rosicrucians" and "Teutonic Knights." Six centuries later, as
the
"Teutonic Order," the Knights would provide the nucleus of Adolph Hitler's
political support in Munich and Vienna."
There is no question whatsoever that the Vatican wants Israel off the
Temple Mount and that the Israeli leadership is accommodating its desire.
But the PLO has plans of its own. By the summer of 2000, they began digging
under the Temple Mount in earnest. Originally they claimed they were simply
expanding a mosque under Solomon's Stables, beneath the Damascus Gate of
Jerusalem's walled Old City. However, the huge mounds of earth and
artifacts from the Second Temple that were being dumped in nearby wadis
betrayed a much more extensive plan.
On January 26, 2001, the Israeli government's television outlet,
Channel One, broadcast a video clip secretly filmed under the Shrine of
Omar, the 7th century Islamic building which may have been deliberately
constructed over the Holy of Holies, the most sacred prayer room of the
ancient Temple. The video revealed a new and massive tunnel aimed directly
at the most sacred core of Solomon's and later, Herod's Temples.
The PLO is after not only the treasures buried beneath the Temple
to
deplete their morally and financially bankrupt regime of terror but must be
looking for more scrolls that can be used to blackmail the Vatican and thus
get their way in world diplomacy. This is why PM Barak is willing to cede
the surface on the Temple Mount to the PLO but insists on keeping Israeli
sovereignty below ground.
The Vatican is terrified that the Jews will uncover the truth
under
the Temple, whatever it may be. It is essential for them that Israel is
removed from the Holy Mount. And they are not alone in this desire.
On Jan. 4, 2001, Colin Grant published a full front page article
in
the Glasgow Sunday Post. He revealed that the Knights Templar, as
descendents the Davidic line believe they have the right to reclaim the
Temple Mount as their true heritage:
"A spokesman for Militi Templi Scotia, the Scottish
Knights Templar
admitted to the Sunday Post, 'We are currently involved in an attempt to
remove control of the holy sites from the Israeli government. We believe
they should be administered by the United Nations and are working with the
UN and NATO to achieve that goal.'"
A secret Medieval battle over the Temple Mount is being conducted
in
Israel today and unless it can be stopped, this skirmish has the potential
of dragging the whole planet into war.
end
The author's latest book The Last Days Of Israel us available from
Dandelion Books in the US. Write
cadler@mindspring.com In Israel
write perkins@netvision.net.il
The second edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin is available in Israel
from the same address or in the US from brooklinebks@delphi.com
All books are sold over amazon.com and barnesandnoble.com
The popular Talk Back section is reportedly back up
at http://www.webseers.com/rabin
(Barry suggests this article, as more evidence of his conclusions - http://www.dcthomson.co.uk/mags/post/news1.htm
)
January 17, 2001 - THE VATICAN'S PLOT AGAINST ISRAEL
In March 1994, the newspaper Chadashot revealed a most remarkable secret of the Middle
East "peace" process. A friend of Shimon Peres, the French intellectual Marek
Halter, claimed in an interview that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the
pope. Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the UN political
control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican hegemony of the holy sites within.
The UN would give the PLO a capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would
become a kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy.
Halter's claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa which
added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was included in the secret clauses
of the Declaration Of Principles signed in Washington in September 1993.
In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a cable from
the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres's Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem confirming the
handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican. This cable was printed on the front page of the
radical leftwing Israeli newspaper, Haaretz two days later. A scandal erupted and numerous
rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services cancelled their invitations in protest
of his treachery. Peres reacted by claiming that the cable was real but that someone had
whited out the word, "not;" the cable really said that Israel would
"not" hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff.
Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel's rabbis, they
accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their tables. However, in the
widely distributed minutes of a meeting with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his
diplomacy, ending with the words, "as I had previously promised the Holy See."
Peres's partner in crime, and the real founder of the Oslo Accord,
Yossi Beilin, coordinated his PLO policy with the Vatican. Check the timing; at the same
moment that he was finagling an accord with the PLO, he was negotiating an agreement for
Vatican recognition of Israel. His deal with the pope became another brief scandal when
politicians like Agudat Yisrael head Avraham Shapira and Jerusalem Deputy Mayor, Shmuel
Meir were leaked hidden details of Beilin's accord which included, "the
extra-territoriality of holy sites in Jerusalem to be transferred to Vatican
control." Later, Shapira was neutralized by having $250 million is debts accrued by
his crooked carpet factory forgiven, while Meir was permanently hushed when his car was
crushed by a UN truck driven by a PLO driver. The driver, of course, was released forever
after being briefly questioned by Israel Police.
Now let us jump to the present. The current Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben
Ami is shuttling between King Carlos of Spain and the Vatican. That is where the action is
for the Israeli government today, and when things get serious, the focus shifts to Paris
where Chirac, Albright and Arafat await him.
There is no question whatsoever that the Vatican wants Israel off the Temple
Mount and that our leadership is accommodating their desire. What I have not been
able to pinpoint is why. However, material sent to me appears to answer the question.
Allow me to preface a few comments before I carry on. The vast majority of my
ongoing readers are not really conspiratorial in their outlook. What attracted them to my
e-mail list and books is that I solved the Rabin assassination to their satisfaction and
that I am offering more likely explanations for Israel's suicide than they are getting
from the mainstream media. It took five years for me to finally instill the fact that the
Council On Foreign Relations (CFR) in New York is Israel's number one enemy, and despite
pouring on the evidence time after time, there are still doubters who refuse to believe
that any organization can have that much power. Every time I dig deep, I'm accused of
going too far, even of fantasizing imaginary foes.
So what am I going to do with the evidence sent to me accusing the
Society Of Jesus, whose members are known as Jesuits, of being the real power behind the
CFR and of being Israel and Judaism's most vicious and successful enemy? My doubters are
going to have a field day with this revelation but I'm going ahead anyway. The weight of
the evidence is beyond merely compelling.
I had known for some time that a former Jesuit priest, Malachi Martin
had exposed his society's treachery at great length. Numerous correspondents insisted I
could not understand Israel's dilemma without reading Martin's revelations. Still, one
voice wasn't enough for me to risk unnecessary mockery. However, recently other voices
have been added to Martin's and I've started paying attention. A composer who I had
greatly admired thirty years ago, Tupper Saussy released a book called Rulers Of Evil,
which expanded on the thesis of Jesuit control of the American political system and is
receiving fine reviews. We have begun a correspondence and I will receive his book
shortly.
In the meantime, allow me to expand on the book I completed reading
yesterday. It is called Vatican Assassins and the author is Eric Jon Phelps. One may read
excerpts by visiting www.vaticanassassins.org. This was no ordinary
reading experience, the manuscript I received spiral bound is 750 pages in length. The
first 600 pages attempt, mostly successfully, to prove that the Jesuits were formed in
reaction to the Protestant Reformation and their goal is to return the planet to the good
old days when one pope held the monopoly on world religion. Utilizing any evil means
available, their plan is to eliminate all the competition be they Jews, Muslims of
Christians who don't recognize the Vatican as their capital.
It is their war on the Jews which will most interest my readers and
from here on, we will concentrate on that one aspect of a most complicated history.
I will start with the book's claim that Jesuit control of Great Britain
was the real force behind Zionism and the re-establishment of a Jewish homeland in Israel.
I have no problem with this thesis since the entire Middle East as it exists today, was
created by the British during and after the first World War. If the British created Saudi
Arabia, Jordan, Iraq, Lebanon etc., one can be very certain they created modern Israel as
well.
The most disturbing charge is that, to populate the new Israel,
the Jesuits stirred up the pogroms and Holocaust of Europe to drive Jews to their safe
haven in the Middle East. On page 548 we read:
"Hitler, now in power, patterned his SS after the Jesuit
Order. He used Roman Catholic Bavarian Himmler with his Jesuit uncle to carry out the
plan. Hitler declares:
' I have learnt most of all from the Jesuit Order. A good
part of that organization I have transported direct to my own party. I will tell you a
secret, I am founding an Order. In Himmler I see our Ignatius de Loyola.'
"Walter Shellenberg, Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitsdienst
(SD) reveals:
' The SS had been organized by Himmler according to the
principles of the Jesuit Order. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by
Ignatius de Loyola constituted a model which Hitler strove carefully to copy.'
" Edmund Paris then asks this most penetrating question
concerning Hitler:
' Was it not his uncle, the Jesuit father, who had been
promoted to a high-ranking officer of the SS? And was not the latter the very eye and arm
of Halke von Ledochowski, General of the Order? Who then was sending so many million
deportees to death? Was it Heinrich Himmler or his uncle, the Jesuit canon?'"
The book details the betrayal of Israel's leadership during the
Holocaust, recalling that Rudolph Kastner, "then one of Israel's most honored
leaders, was a traitor who had cooperated with the Nazi leaders of Germany including
Adolph Eichmann to deport Jews from Hungary." I don't dispute this claim and anyone
who does should read Ben Hecht's, Perfidy or The Transfer Agreement by Edwin Black. It is
the conclusion drawn from this treason, on page 584, which is far more troublesome:
"Ah, dear truth seeker, Zionist Israel is a creation of the
Jesuit Order. Its purpose is to secure Jerusalem for the Jesuits "infallible"
Pope, that he may receive worldwide worship from Solomon's rebuilt Temple. If the Masonic
Zionists betrayed their own Jewish race into Pius XII's concentration camps overseen by
the Jesuit Order, would they not betray the nation of Israel by giving Jerusalem to the
Pope in preparation for the rebuilding of Solomon's Temple?
"...Therefore we are living under the preeminence of a Gentile
Jesuit conspiracy. It employs notorious Masonic Jews and Gentiles as their agents. This
furthers the deception of an international Jewish conspiracy oppressing the nations. Using
this lie, the Jesuit General in creating global, anti-Jewish fury again. This fury will
culminate in the last mad attempt to invade Israel and destroy the physical descendants of
Jacob."
And who is leading the invasion? We learn that Bill Clinton was
the student president of the Jesuit's Georgetown University and, for a time, expressed the
desire of becoming a Jesuit priest. In those days, Clinton was sent to England on a Rhodes
scholarship, with all that that implies, and at an anti-American demonstration met Jesuit
Friar Richard McSorely, who later headed Georgetown's Center For Peace Studies. On page
672, we get a haunting hint at Clinton's later role in Israel's destruction, as well as
those of Norway and France:
"McSorley then went to France and Scandinavia to meet peace
people. Stepping off the train right behind him in Oslo, Norway was Bill Clinton."
And if a Clinton Democrat fails to ignite the flames that will engulf
Israel, the Jesuits, "will use the Republican Party to bring a Jesuit-controlled,
Jew-hating fascist dictator to power, 'For the greater glory of the god who sits in St.
Peter's chair.'"
That's Eric Jon Phelps explanation why Israel's political leaders,
especially those of the Labor Party, are running between, Chirac, King Carlos and the
Vatican to secure a "peace" treaty with the PLO. I can only advise my readers
not to dismiss the possibility that he got it right.
***
I am planning an American tour in March. So far I have received invitations from Colorado
and Texas. If your organization, place of worship, cultural center etc. would like to hear
my lecture, Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin, please contact me by e-mail.
The second edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin is doing very well, thanks in large part
to its weekly serialization in New York's widely read newspaper, The Jewish Press. To
acquire a copy, write the publisher at brooklinebks@delphi.com or in the US call 1 800
666BOOK. In Israel, write perkins@netvision.net.il or call 02 6712284 for this book
and the following.
THE LAST DAYS OF ISRAEL, by Barry Chamish, ISBN 1893302164 - $16.95, is now
available:
Internet: at www.bn.com
Soon on line at www.amazon.com , and other online
bookstores...
and at your favorite physical bookstore(s).
Listed in Books in Print under title, author, Dandelion Books, publisher and ISBN number.
Distributed by Ingram (US) and Bartram (UK).
THIS BOOK IS A MUST READ.
WE URGE YOU TO TAKE TIME TO ENTER A REVIEW IN THE ON LINE BOOKSTORES.
Look for the cover picture soon in the bn.com listing. Sorry it's not there yet. We're
getting there...putting the industry to the test as pioneers in Internet print-on-demand
in the New Age of digital book production and delivery!
Thank you in advance for your orders --
Carol Adler
President, Dandelion Books
www.dandelionbooks.com
Voice - 480-897-4452
Fax - 480-897-4453
5250 South Hardy Drive - Ste. 3067
Tempe, Arizona 85283
USA
January 9, 2001 - WHAT ABOUT THOSE TRIPS AND HOW
ABOUT THAT CFR?
Last report I offered to fax the head of the Shabak at the time of Rabin's
murder, Carmi Gillon's Interior Ministry travel records to anyone so requesting them. I
can't afford it anymore. I kept my word and faxed and faxed for two days. Now I'm looking
at requests from all over North America and Europe and I've decided that I'll go bust if I
send them all out.
So, let's all say a blessing for the Internet. I've attached the records.
Zoom in until you see on Page one Gillon's army and civilian details to prove the
document is authentic. On Page two, scroll down to the bottom and you'll see that from the
tenth of September 95 to October 31, Gillon was out of the country. He flew back to Israel
for less than a day, then flew off to Paris, by his own admission, returning the night of
Rabin's murder.
Everyone who has seen the records has remarked that they point in
mighty sinister directions. For the fifty one days leading to Rabin's murder, the head of
the Secret Services charged with protecting the prime minister was out of the country,
except for a brief visit four days before the murder.
I am so grateful for the wonderful contacts I have made. A Shabak
officer, no less, under Gillon's command, explained the significance of the records:
In this list, the trips
effected with PRIVATE aircraft(s) are not mentioned.
During 16/9-31/10/95 he was in Israel 25 (not
consecutive) days. Those exits/entries from/to Israel
are not mentioned in this list. He used his
DARKON SHERUT, and DIDN'T pass through
Passport Control.
Now, please look at the list. SGIRA MINHALIT
appears 3 times .
First time : exit16/09/95-returned 31/10/95-
DIVUAH on 31/10/95-but the RISHUM effected on
January 1st, 1996- 2 months later.!!!!
Second time: exit 19/03/97-returned 06/05/97-
DIVUAH on 06/05/97-RISHUM 15/05/97- 9 days
later.
Third time:exit13/04/00-returned 23/05/00-DIVUAH
on 23/05/00-RISHUM 28/05/00- 5 DAYS LATER.
Okay, now let's be detectives. Gillon left the country on September 16 on his DARKON
SHERUT, or diplomatic passport. During this period he used his diplomatic passport on
several occasions so was only out of the country 26 days not 51. However, after this
period, the Interior Ministry took two months to write these trips into their RISHUM,
registry. In most other cases the registry notes trips abroad within ten days.
Okay, so why was the head of the Shabak jetsetting outside the country for most of the
period leading up to Rabin's murder? Why didn't he write about these trips in his book?
Why hasn't any other media reported these trips? Where did he go? Why did he return five
days before Rabin's murder, and with barely a moment to catch his breath, fly off to
France? Shall we call it a coincidence that he was booked to return to Israel at almost
precisely the minute Rabin was murdered?
Sure, let's do that for the time being. Now let's get into a really interesting area. In
the middle column of the records are the Hebrew words, SGIRA MINHALIT, administrative
closure. This procedure effectively hides the comings and goings of the traveller on a
diplomatic passport. Thus we must learn that Gillon was abroad 26 days and in Israel 25,
from an inside source who I trust as accurate.
So we ask, is the head of the General Security Services a diplomat and is he eligible to
receive a diplomatic passport? Let's say, sure, why not? Now let's look at the two other
periods when Gillon left the country in a private plane on a diplomatic passport; from the
19th of March to the 6th of May, 1997 and between the 12th of April and 23rd of May, 2000.
During the first period, Gillon was head of the National Insurance Institute of Israel,
Avner. His primary duty was to make car insurance profitable. So we ask, why does the
country's top insurance broker and claims underwriter receive a diplomatic passport? To
look at top secret foreign actuarial tables? And who is flying the head of the insurance
institute on his private plane to discuss the hush-hush topic of reducing
highway accidents?
Now let's examine the next period when Gillon leaves the country on a diplomatic passport,
in the spring of 2000. He has embarked on a new career and at this juncture he is the
chairman of the Peres Center For Peace, a private foundation founded by Shimon Peres. Now
since Gillon was no longer in public service, who issued him a passport restricted to
diplomats? And if the Peres Peace Center, which is supposed to initiate cooperative
industrial projects, is actually a public institution capable of requesting diplomatic
immunity for its employees, why doesn't the public know about this fact?
Carmi Gillon has one very spooky existence. I'll stick with my initial analysis; he is
under the control of foreign interests and during the late summer and early autumn of
1995, he was with them ironing the bugs out of the upcoming Rabin murder.
And if not, it's time Gillon came clean and explained where he was then and why he was
shuttling around the world on a diplomatic license later on when he was in no way supposed
to be a diplomat.
And now the Council On Foreign Relations...Yes, we all noticed it and I did get letters
patting me on the back. On January 8, 2001, Ehud Barak addressed the CFR in New York via
the 'net. Here is the opening of his address as released by the Israel Government Press
Office, with remarks in brackets by the Israeli media watch organization IMRA..
OPENING REMARKS OF PRIME MINISTER EHUD BARAK - COUNCIL ON
FOREIGN RELATIONS
JANUARY 8, 2001
(IMRA: Source: Israel Government Press Office- original also all in caps.
[President Clinton spoke at The ISRAEL POLICY FORUM, an organization set up
to support the Labor Party in the United States and also to provide campaign
funds to the Labor Party in Israel - it has no relation to the Council on
Foreign Relations]
It is interesting to note that while in this presentation Barak says he
wants to bring the agreement to the Israeli public to decide, in the very
same talk he explains that he would like the international community to
adopt the principles of this agreement BEFORE the citizens of Israel have
had their say so that Israel faces the choice between accepting the deal or
defying the United Nations. Israel Radio diplomatic correspondent Yoni Ben
Menachem reported on 9 January that experts in the Foreign Ministry warned
today that a presidential declaration or a declaration adopted or supported
by the international community would be against Israel's interests as it
would tie the hands of the next elected Israeli Government.)
THANK YOU LES AND THE COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS, AND HELLO TO
EVERYONE WHO IS ON THE LINE WITH US TODAY. (Barak thanks the sinister and evil CFR
chairman Lesley Gelb. BC)
I AM SO PLEASED TO BE ABLE TO PARTICIPATE WITH YOU FROM JERUSALEM.
I, OF COURSE, GREATLY APPRECIATE THE CALIBER OF DISCUSSION THAT TAKES
PLACE IN THIS PRESTIGIOUS FORUM ON SO MANY IMPORTANT ISSUES.
THANK YOU FOR INVITING ME TO GIVE THE LEFFINGWELL LECTURE, AND TO
SHARE MY VIEWS ON ISRAEL'S ENGAGEMENT IN THE PEACE PROCESS, AS WELL
AS OUR POLICIES IN RECENT WEEKS AND MONTHS.
BEFORE I BEGIN, LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, I'D LIKE TO TAKE ONE BRIEF
MOMENT TO REVIEW SOME OF THE DEVELOPMENTS THAT LED US TO WHERE WE ARE
TODAY.
So, lest anyone doubt my contention that Barak is a CFR stooge, why should he take time
from his busy schedule of handing out chunks of his country to an Arab terror group with
no intention of signing a peace treaty with him, to communicate with a 3000 member think
tank?
Now let us look at the kind organization Barak chooses to address as seen by two prominent
Jewish thinkers. Let us start with Arye Gallin, head of Root And Branch in Israel:
Almost all that I have learned about the New World Order, the Council on Foreign
Relations, and related topics, I have learned from them.
They are:
Barry Chamish (author of several books, including "Who Murdered Yitzchak
Rabin").
Joel Bainerman (co-author, with Barry, of the magazine "Inside Israel").
David Perkins (owner of the Zionist Book Club, which distributes Barry's books and has
started to publish some of them as well).
John Hulley (former senior economist, specializing in the world oil industry, at the World
Bank in Washington, D.C., who converted to Judaism and lives here now)
You asked me if Daniel Pipes' sidekick Steven Emerson is also a member of the Council on
Foreign Relations. The answer is no. I checked the membership list and his
name does not appear there.
I am sorry to say that the following persons' names, among those of many, many others, DO
appear there:
Prof. Bernard Lewis ("expert" on Islam)
Prof. Fouad Ajami (former Lebanese Shiite)
Norman Podhoretz (former Editor-in-Chief and now Editor-at-large of Commentary and famous
"neo-conservative")
Irving Kristol (famous "neo-conservative")
Dr. Francis Fukuyama (ethnic Chinese "political philosopher")
Prof. Smauel P. Huntington (Albert J. Weatherhead University Professor at Harvard
University -- see below)
Robert Bartley (Editor-in-Chief, The Wall Street Journal)
Edgar Bronfman (owner of the World Jewish Congress)
Henry Siegman (former director of the World Jewish Congress, now head of the Middle East
department at C.F.R.)
ex-Senator Alfonse d'Amato (who together with Edgar Bronfman, working through the vehicle
of the World Jewish Congress, attack the Swiss for stealing bank accounts of Jews murdered
in the Nazi Genocide, all true, but sub-text: Anglo-American banking establishment
wants to knock out the Gnomes of Zurich, what better way to do that than to wrap oneself
in the cause of righteousness, fighting on behalf of murdered Jews).
The website address of the Council is [www.cfr.org],
in case you want to go have a look at them.
I actually went over to their offices in New York City and rang the doorbell (literally),
went in, and picked up a membership information package (hence my copy of their 1999-2000
Annual Report). I had heard so much about this organization that I wanted to see if
it really exists. Oh boy, does it exist! The CFR's main headquarters occupies
the Pratt Mansion, at the corner of Park Avenue and 68th Street, donated by magnat Pratt
to the Council to house it after its founding in 1923.
When you look closely at the membership list (and this does not include the members of
their International Advisory Board), you see the people at the TOP of the food chain in
every field: government, business, armed forces, academia, media, etc.
And who are these people?
IN GENERAL, they are "secular" Jews and Gentiles. It does not matter if,
within the CFR umbrella, some are "conservative" (William F. Buckley is a
member) and some are "liberal". None of them are "religious" and
that is why the people who have published your work so far have been "religious"
Jews such as Sheila Abrams at the Jewish Press, Susan Rosenbluth at the Jewish Voice and
Opinion, and Rabbi Pesach Lerner of the National Council of Young Israel.
"Neo-conservatives", such as Norman Podhoretz (I put him on our Islam email list
years ago, he receives everything we send out by you), his daughter Ruthie Blum (editor of
the Jerusalem Post Magazine), and his son John Podhoretz (editor of the New York Post)
have NO RESPONSE to what you say. They can't deal with it. You are TOO
religious for their tastes. And CFR member Daniel Pipes is no different.
CFR people, whether "right" of center or "left" of [the Rockefeller
family's oil business] "center", whether "neo-conservative" or
"liberal", DON'T LIKE Torah-true Jews, Qur'an-true Sunni Muslims and
Bible-believing Christians. They cannot CONTROL them so easily, because their faith
may have more power than Rockefeller's money [and the money of his fellow Anglo-American
multinational business magnates'] generously doled out to his servants' bank accounts.
Let's take a look at just one example of how the CFR P.R. machine works.
CFR member, Harvard University (Director, John M. Olin Institute for Strategic Studies;
Chairman, Harvard Academy for International and Areas Studies] Professor Samuel P.
Huntington, publishes a book entitled "The Clahs of Civilizations: Remaking of
World Order" (1997, Touchstone Books, Rockefeller Center, New York).
Huntington's book, an exercise in intellectual mediocrity, is greeted by the CFR
controlled press as being like the word of G-d from Mount Sinai.
Huntington's "remarkable" thesis? Man does not live by bread alone!
People are influenced by their religion, culture, history, etc., and will not drop all of
that to become units of human capital in the global marketplace planned by the C.F.R.
magnates. A problem indeed for those planning world control of the to-be-zombified
and zonked out masses, doped up on McDonald's, Burger King and mindless consumerism.
And who gives the "rave reviews" of C.F.R. member Huntington's
"astounding" book (I am looking at a copy right in front of me that I asked my
father to buy me, and which I just received by mail a few days ago)?
1. Fellow CFR member Francis Fukuyama (remember, the moron who wrote a book that
appeared ten years ago arrogantly predicting the "end of history"? A book
also greeted as the world of G-d from Mount Sinai? And where is that moron's thesis
today? In the garbage dump! Fukuyama on Huntington: "The book is
dazzling in its scope and grasp of the intricacies of contemporary global politics".
2. Fellow CFR member Henry Kissinger.
3. Fellow CFR member Zbigniew Brzezinski.
See how the game works? And old David Rockefeller, Honorary Chairman of the C.F.R.,
having with his friends bought up and endowed most of the Western "think" tanks,
institutes, centers of this and that, newspapers, magazines, radio and TV networks (C.N.N.
is one of the worst), sits back and enjoys the show like some ancient or medieval
potentate watching the wise men at his court entertain his guests (after all, rich people
have nothing to talk about, so who provides all the conversation at those long banquets?
To make a long answer longer: No, Steven Emerson is not a member of the C.F.R....yet
(to become a member, one must be sponsored by two current members, and then have your
application approved by the membership committee). If Stevey plays the game long
enough, and if he has sufficient ambition, he will join Dippy Danny as another Rockefeller
Court Jew. Stevey has not yet attained that exalted status. Aryeh
Now let us read Dr. Eugene Narrett, a prominent yeshiva professor, once fired from the
Boston Globe for knowing too much about how the world operates:
Powell's Plan & Ugly Precedent of Big Power Self Interest, E.
Narrett, 7
Tevet 5761, Jan. 03, 2001
"Our dealings in the Arab world were extensive. We had to regard our own
wider interests in dealing with King Hussein" (Peter Tripp, British Foreign
Office, on "Black September" crisis of 1970)
The Clinton legacy in the Middle East is disintegrating and thanks
largely to the people of Yesha, Israel is still standing. All the king's
horses, principally, worn-out nag, Ehud al Buraq and all the king's men from
Carville to Greenberg to Beilin can't put this Humpty Dumpty back together
again, though they will try. They can thank the recipient of their emoluments
and supplications, Yasir Arafat for breaking the eggs they were so busily
counting. Clinton and Baraq are pulpy politicians. Dictator for life Yasir
squeezed the lemons for all the concessions they could give, and now is
discarding the rinds. They did everything for him but disarm the Israeli army
and bar its air force from flying, but it wasn't enough. Above all else, he
intends that his own show go on.
On December 31, the Israeli Supreme Court gave Baraq two days to explain
the legal basis upon which he, after resigning and now simply an MK and
implausible candidate for office, was negotiating away the heart of his
nation's land including most of its capital city. Even leftish hand wringer,
Attorney General Elyakim Rubinstein sent a public letter "raising doubt about
the moral authority of the resigned Prime Minister" to deal with lame duck
President Clinton "who will no longer bear any responsibility for
implementing the agreement." Rubinstein's letter was as odd as most of his
and the Court's erratic and politicized acts of omission and commission,
being phrased in pragmatic and moral rather than legal grounds that would
have been more devastating and should have been appended to an indictment.
These chronic problems will need to be addressed but for now, the effect was
salutary. Facing a revolt in the armed forces, running at about 25% in the
polls, with his Labor and Socialist colleagues threatening to replace him
before the election, Baraq told his master, Clinton, "given the severe
attacks, the talks have given way to intensive action on our part to stop the
terrorism" (01-02-01). The latter claim is a fraud but the message was clear.
The "signing ceremony the White House had planned for January 10" was off (A-7
, 12-26-00).
But as the Clinton team packs its bags and the man from Hope prepares to
become a talk show host and spokesman for the World Bank (Drudge Reports,
12-17-00), there is scarcely time for a sigh of relief and certainly no
reason for rejoicing in Israel. The incoming Bush administration will be less
crude in its prodding and will shift its focus from Judea & Samaria to the
Golan Heights but at the Executive level of American government, the
mendacious and dangerous moral equivalence will continue, as indicated by
Secretary of State designate, Colin Powell.
Tuesday afternoon, January 02, President elect Bush formally introduced
Powell to the press and the latter offered an unsurprising and troubling
assessment on Clinton Middle East policy and its "new direction" under Bush
II. Powell heaped praise on "the tireless, hands-on involvement President
Clinton gave for eight years in trying to get an agreement" between the
"Palestinians" and Israelis. "It is evident that the parties cannot or will
not come to an agreement," he added, equating Israel with Arafat in what
since Camp David and more emphatically, since Oslo has become a State
Department signature. This new "official history" is more than a lie that
pitilessly insults the three hundred Jews murdered by Arabs during the
multi-faceted Oslo assault on Israel. It buries facts in establishing further
the dangerous public "truth" that these are two squabbling enemies whose
claims and wishes are similar. That is the legacy of those in the "peace
camp" that for eight decades has dedicated itself to the "two-state
solution"
("Letter to the Palestinian leadership," Ha'Aretz 01-02-01. In fact, since
Britain severed trans-Jordan from the Mandate its has been a "three-state
solution).
The time was right and the facts at hand for Powell to eschew this moral
and intellectual relativism. State Department pressure and UN condemnations,
endlessly amplified by the major media, Arab violence and treasonous
initiatives and suicidal oversights by the Israeli left had borne fruit that
promised to lead to more war and the disappearance of an independent Israel.
The Arabs and their global sponsors received unprecedented concessions
culminating in the de facto surrender by Israel of its already tiny air
space, the Temple Mount and most of old Jerusalem. Powell ignored all these
concessions and the opportunity to unequivocally excoriate or, at least,
identify Yasir Arafat and his officers as the criminals they are. The fact
that he did not do so indicates the seamless Council
of Foreign Relations
form of American foreign policy, especially in the Middle East. Like Madeline
Albright and Bill Clinton and Baraq, too, Powell, James Baker and Bush Sr.
(as well as most network news "anchors") are members of this group of world
controllers. An independent Jewish State is grit in their machine. They
intend to cripple or internationalize it, as the partitions of 1922, 1937 and
1947 indicated. So too showed the relentless diplomatic pressure and economic
and military blackmail that followed the Israeli victories of 1956, 1967 and
1973. It was the same with the intifada that even as it was being defeated
served as a "crisis" to help launch the 1991 Madrid talks that led to Oslo.
That's where the Bush-Powell part of the tag team picks up from their de
facto partners in the Clinton administration. After he had equated the
Israelis and Palestinians, Powell announced that the focus would become
American-led efforts to broker an "agreement with Syria." Translated into
English, this means that Israel will be pressured to surrender the Golan
Heights, the goal Rabin was selected to in 1991-2 to achieve. Rabin was
elected by promising to effectively limit (or shut down) the "Palestinian
track:" no negotiation on Jerusalem, no surrender of the Jordan Valley, no
negotiation with the PLO, no surrender of the Golan." The "four no's" were
four lies, as the Clinton era made apparent, but betrayal of Israel by the
big powers and by its own leftwing elite is par for the 20th century course.
- Eugene Narrett, PhD teaches at
Yeshiva Academy, Worcester Mass.
Yes, the Jews are waking up, at long last and maybe in time to salvage their nation
before
more Shabak/CFR tricks lead to fake religious/right outrages to assure a Barak or, watch
it, Peres election victory. As for me, I'm not voting. Sharon, as I have proven well, is
in the CFR camp as tightly as is Barak, or was Rabin and Netanyahu. I'll vote again after
the revolution.
***
The second edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin is sold over Amazon or Barnes and Noble.
In the US call 1 800 666BOOK. In Israel 02 6712284.
THE LAST DAYS OF ISRAEL, by Barry Chamish, ISBN 1893302164 - $16.95, is now
available:
Internet: at www.bn.com
Soon on line at www.amazon.com , and other online
bookstores...
and at your favorite physical bookstore(s).
Listed in Books in Print under title, author, Dandelion Books, publisher and ISBN number.
Distributed by Ingram (US) and Bartram (UK).
THIS BOOK IS A MUST READ.
WE URGE YOU TO TAKE TIME TO ENTER A REVIEW IN THE ON LINE BOOKSTORES.
Look for the cover picture soon in the bn.com listing. Sorry it's not there yet. We're
getting there...putting the industry to the test as pioneers in Internet print-on-demand
in the New Age of digital book production and delivery!
Thank you in advance for your orders --
Carol Adler
President, Dandelion Books
www.dandelionbooks.com
Voice - 480-897-4452
Fax - 480-897-4453
5250 South Hardy Drive - Ste. 3067
Tempe, Arizona 85283
USA
January 4, 2001 - Two Sites
Hello,
I never correspond twice in a week but times
are desperate. I take
a break after this. The reason for the letter is to inform you of two sites
which may help put our danger in perspective. The first site contains
Hebrew information about the Rabin murder. The more Israelis who read the
facts, the better. Let them know. The next is a chapter from Rabbi Marvin
Antleman's second edition of To Eliminate The Opiate which explains who
runs the war against Judaism and Israel. Hope this helps. Best, Barry Chamish
http://members.iol.co.il/truthful
http://www.davidicke.net/emagazine/vol18/articles/opiate.html
January 2, 2001 - CONFERENCE TRAPS GILLON
The Root And Branch Rabin Assassination Conference was a wonderful
success. Thanks to a prominent Jerusalem Post report on the upcoming event,
written by a lovely lady named Abigail, every seat in Jerusalem's Windmill
Hotel was filled. Prof. Arieh Zaritzky was a masterful ringmaster for the
six speakers, all of whom were well appreciated but the highlight of the
evening in many people's minds was a banned film on the murder prepared by
talented students of Tel Aviv University's Communications Faculty.
I had hoped that the conference would lead to new data but in my
dreams I could not have anticipated the volume of sensitive documentation
that was traded. I am still analyzing the material handed to me for the
future but I will now reveal the most important new information I have
received in the past year.
A gentleman handed me a file and said, "I think you'd better
look at
this. It confirms your thesis of outside involvement in the Rabin
assassination." The next morning, I opened his envelope and what was in it
but Carmi Gillon's Interior Ministry file?
Gillon was head of the General Security Services (Shabak) prior to and
during the Rabin murder. And as I and others have proven, was a chief
conspirator in the same murder. I will never ask how my informant acquired
his file but it is the most guarded piece of evidence I had held in many a
month.
The Interior Ministry issues passports and registers the comings and
goings of all who pass through Ben Gurion Airport. Here is Gillon's
itinerary for the two months prior to the assassination:
From Nov. 1 to Nov. 5/95 (Rabin was murdered on the 4th), Gillon
was
abroad. This is no secret, he was in Paris, he claims, meeting with French
Intelligence to advise them on Algerian terrorists. BUT there is a trip
previous to that which he does not mention in his book nor, as far as I
have ever found, was ever publicized.
On September 16/95, Gillon left Israel and did not return until
October 31/95. He landed in Israel and within a day was on a plane to
France, returning the night of the assassination. The file does not reveal
the ostensible reason for the long trip. In fact, the reasons are
deliberately removed from the document with the explanation,
"Administrative Closure."
Please absorb this fact; for a month and a half, prior to his
trip to
Paris, or for 51 days prior to the Rabin murder, the commander of the
Shabak was NOT IN ISRAEL.
So:
- Who was commanding the Shabak within the
country if Gillon was
commanding it from without?
- Where was Gillon and what was he doing away
from his post for 51
days?
- Why has this journey been covered up? Why
didn't Gillon even
mention it in his book?
- Why did he return to Israel for less than a
day before flying off
to France on Nov. 1?
My informant was right, this file leads to the conclusion that
the
"peace" process which culminated in the Rabin assassination was directed
from outside our country with the collusion of the head of the internal
security and intelligence forces. Now we must force Gillon to own up to the
trip and explain what he was doing abroad for 51 days prior to the Rabin
murder.
The best way is to spread this document far and wide. I will send it to
anyone who e-mails me their fax number. Get it into the hands of the most
influential people you know. I have the goods and Gillon is trapped. Make
him talk!
While the Gillon file is so far the most dramatic of the
information
traded, there was far more to be considered. A gentleman informed me,
"Yoram Rubin was not Rabin's personal bodyguard. I know who was; in fact he
was a partner of mine in a small business. His name is Tzahi and he was
sent out of the country a few days before the murder. He knows he was
removed to allow the murder to take place but no longer talks about what he
knows."
The conference took place on the day Binyamin Kahane and his wife
were
murdered and this easily halved attendance. This also changed the look of
the audience to mostly secular. Nonetheless, one resident of Samaria
divided her time between the funeral and the conference. She told me, "A
few weeks ago, a friend, Nissim was shot in his car just outside Peduel. He
was taken to hospital where a Shabak agent wouldn't allow him to be
operated on until he signed a confession stating that he shot himself in
the legs in order to incite hatred against the Palestinians. He refused and
the agent insisted. Finally the agent gave up but we are all asking if the
Shabak is working directly for the PLO."
That is, indeed the case. For the past month, the PLO and a
classified IDF assassination team have been exchanging intelligence on the
whereabouts of enemies they want eliminated. Arafat is targeting leaders of
the Tanzim and other militias opposed to his rule, while the Israelis are
eliminating religious leaders of Judea and Samaria.
Thirty nine Israelis have been murdered by the PLO in the
past two
months including the following religious leaders: Rabbis Herling, Raanan,
Lieberman and Kahane. Murdered also was Ayelet Hashahar Levy, daughter of
Rabbi Yitzhak Levy. Murder attempts were made against Israel's Chief Rabbi
Lau, and Rabbi Brovinger.
Ask a statistician what the odds of these attacks being
random are.
The goal of the foreign-controlled Israelis leading the "peace" process are
to destroy Zionism and Judaism itself through the systematic assassination
of religious leaders.
To conclude: every now and then I receive a letter from
political
analyst Daniel Pipes complaining that he is a member of The Council On
Foreign Relations and I have them all wrong. Do I, really? CFR member Pipes
wrote an article for the Jerusalem Post today absolving the US of any
involvement in the Oslo "peace" process. The title is, The Oslo Process: An
Israeli Choice. The conclusion is: "Israelis are making their own choices
and forging their own destiny."
So CFR member Pipes, consider this: In February 1994, Joel
Bainerman
and I interviewed Oslo negotiator Ron Pundak at a Tel Aviv cafe. He told us
that the State Department directed the negotiations from the first evening
they began and that, "Warren Christopher was skeptical at first but became
a major advocate of the process."
This is one tiny detail I have collected proving the Oslo process
was
initiated on September 17/92 in a meeting between CFR executive George Bush
and Yitzhak Rabin at Kennebunkport, Maine, because Rabin himself said that
Bush had ordered him ,"to prepare the Israeli people for painful concessions."
So CFR member Pipes, who are you trying to fool and on behalf of
whom?
* * *
The author's new book The Last Days Of Israel is available in the US by
writing cadler@mindspring.com
>or calling 1-877-517-9436. In Israel write perkins@netvision.net.il
or
>call 02 6712284, also for the new edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin in
>English. In America call 1800 666BOOK or write brooklinebks@delphi.com
|