|
[left.htm]
| |
Barry Chamish Newsletter Archives
February 21 - No Sympathy For Har-Shefi.
February 19 - Jerusalem Post Deletes Radio Interview.
February 14 - The Guilt-Ridden Jews of the New World Order.
February 12 - Rabin's Last Doctor and the Knights Templar.
February 9 - No Reason to Celebrate Sharon's Victory.
February 21, 2001 - NO SYMPATHY FOR HAR SHEFI
Yesterday, the Israeli Supreme Court turned down Margalit Har
Shefi's
petition to appeal her indictment for failure to prevent the murder of
Yitzhak Rabin. So she's off to the slammer for nine months and I feel no
sympathy for her whatsoever. Here's why.
Shortly after Yitzhak Rabin's murder, Margalit Har Shefi was
arrested
as a suspect in a wider conspiracy than just Yigal Amir. Not long after her
incarceration, the Shabak (General Security Services) provocateur Avishai
Raviv was placed inside her cell. Since mixing the sexes in Israeli jails
is forbidden, we can be pretty sure that Har Shefi had some Shabak ties of
her own.
But so did her uncle, Rabbi Benny Elon who will soon be sitting
in the
new Sharon government. A few days after, Elon broke the news that Yigal
Amir's good buddy in the Eyal movement, Avishai Raviv was a Shabak agent
and Eyal was a Shabak creation. How did Eilon know before anyone else?
He knew because HE worked with Raviv and I have solid witnesses
to
back me up. Elon hung around young people at anti-Oslo rallies and directed
them into the arms of Avishai Raviv. As one Eyal teenager told me, "I was
at a protest rally outside Orient House and Benny Elon told me, 'You have
to meet this guy.' Then he introduced me to Avishai. He was the matchmaker
between me and Raviv and because of him, I could have been Yigal Amir."
Early in my research I worked with two filmmakers, Merav Ktorza
and
Alon Eilat, who turned out to be inappropriate to the task. But they did
score a few coups and one occurred in a meeting with Elon. He told them
that a couple of months before the assassination, Yitzhak Shamir called him
into his office and told him, 'They're going to kill Rabin and blame the
Right. They're planning another Arlozoroff and this time we won't get back
in power for another fifty years. I want you to identify potential
assassins in your community to prevent the murder." Elon refused to repeat
the statement on camera but there are two strong witnesses who said he made it.
Margalit Har Shefi, a political organizer at Bar Ilan University
started palling around with two Shabak assets, Avishai Raviv and Yigal
Amir. Amir was the chief social director and public speaker of Eyal. His
task was to attract idealistic young people opposed to the Oslo Accords and
turn them into hyper-extremist criminals. The youths he attracted at his
Shabbat seminars and his yeshivah speaking engagements were then directed
into the clutches of Raviv and Eyal.
Amir and Benny Elon were doing the same thing for the Shabak. And
I
strongly suspected so was Har Shefi and said so publicly at the Rabin
Assassination Conference last Dec. 31 in Jerusalem. Listening to me in the
audience was Har Shefi's grandmother Pnina Peli.
She approached me after my speech, introduced herself and said,
"You're right about Margalit and Benny but you've got the motive all
wrong." I quickly directed her to a semi-quiet nook in the auditorium and
asked her what she meant. "They were supposed to do a good thing, stop a
political assassination. They didn't know the Shabak was using them."
Too many people were approaching me with questions and I asked
Mrs.
Peli to meet me at the end of the conference. However, the event went on
too long and I had to suffice myself with our two minutes of conversation.
But I think what she said was wise and right.
Benny Elon was an early activist for truth about the Rabin
assassination. He testified at the Shamgar Commission about Raviv's
activities and then, as far as I know, never made a public accusation
again. That task was left to his wife Emunah who collected all the
newspaper clippings about Raviv in one damning volume called The Raviv
File. And then she stopped her activities.
The Benny Elon family know all about Raviv and the more lurid
background of the Rabin murder but they have not helped Margalit Har Shefi
in any way. The opposite. Benny Elon's left wing brother was hired as Har
Shefi's lawyer and he simply did not defend her. Worse, he incriminated her
even more deeply.
His chosen defence was that Har Shefi didn't take Amir's threats
against Rabin seriously and to prove it he coached Har Shefi to stress the
fact that she asked her rabbi if Amir's biblical justifications for Rabin's
murder were legitimate. What a trap he laid for Har Shefi! Obviously if she
went to her rabbi, she did take Amir seriously and thus should have
informed the police about him. That's the way the judges saw it and from
then on Har Shefi's chances for acquittal were over.
Margalit Har Shefi had the best defence of all. She was innocent
of
the charge of not preventing Yigal Amir from murdering Yitzhak Rabin
because he didn't do it. She and her family have been contacted by numerous
friends and given the documentation. There is not an honest court on earth
which would convict Amir because there is no evidence against him. But
there is a whole pile of solid evidence against Rabin's bodyguard, Yoram
Rubin, who did shoot him and almost as much against Shimon Peres, who
indirectly ordered him to.
And if Har Shefi and her family were really interested in saving
her
from prison, they would have used it. And if Benny Elon really cared about
his niece, he would have testified to what he knew about Raviv and the
murder. And if Margalit Har Shefi wanted to be free, she would have told
the truth about Eyal.
Now, I know they were warned not to. And we can be sure the
warnings
were terrible and terrifying. However, there are other people trying to get
to the bottom of the Rabin assassination who have suffered in similar ways
and I'm one of them. I'm taking ridiculous risks, so how can I be
sympathetic to Har Shefi when she won't tell the truth to save her life?
I can only suggest a strong action which could redeem her. On
February
27, in Jerusalem District Court, Avishai Raviv's trial begins again. He is
also charged with failure to prevent Rabin's murder and his role is a great
deal deeper than Har Shefi's. It would be a very good idea for her and her
advocates to sit in his trial if the sessions are open. Raviv's trial must
be scrutinized without letup, not just for her sake, but for Rabin's and
that of the Jewish nation. The phone number of the court is 02 6706411. She
would be wise to find out if the trial will be open and when. And she would
be wiser if her supporters filled the courtroom at all times.
Meanwhile, Rabin's real murderer Shimon Peres is on his way to
the
Sharon cabinet, while Margalit Har Shefi is on her way to prison. Such is
the upside down moral reality of Israel.
* * *
Here is the author's upcoming speaking schedule. Contact the organizers for
details:
>>hoascanim@netscape.net
Brooklyn, NY
March
5
agoldstein@ok.org
Far
Rockaway,NY March 6
>>DALewMin@aol.com
Springfield, MO
March
8
>>jskousen@qwest.net
Salt Lake City,
UT March 10-11
>>Don@amerifree.com
Denver,Colorado
March 13
>>yafbatya@hotmail.com
Dallas, San Antonio, Houston, Tyler
TX
>>beginning March 16
pgoodgame@hawaii.rr.com
Honolulu, HI
April
3
The author's book The Last Days Of Israel is available from Dandelion Books
in the US. Write cadler@mindspring.com.
The new edition of Who Murdered
Yitzhak Rabin is available from Brookline Books.
Write brooklinebks@delphi.com
Both books are available in Israel from the
Zionist Book Club. Write perkins@netvision.net.il
or call 02 6712284.
All books by the author are sold over amazon or barnesandnoble. Please
visit http://www.webseers.com/rabin
February 19, 2001 - JERUSALEM POST DELETES RADIO
INTERVIEW
Josh Wander, the gutsy Jerusalem Post Radio interviewer, who's
conversation with me was placed on the Weekender section of the Post's radio page last
Thursday, just called to say that, "Our interview was taken off the site. The order
came from higher-ups."
In that interview, I traced Ariel Sharon's ties to the
Council On Foreign Relations and promised listeners that there would be no change of
policy with the new prime minister, only a change of style. Oslo would continue and its
promulgators, Ehud Barak and Shimon Peres would lead the cabinet as before.
"I think what got them angry, "explained Wander,
"were your accusations against Henry Kissinger. I heard he's on the Post board."
That wouldn't surprise me since the chairman of this board is CFR hotshot Conrad Black.
In the past few days I have received a torrent of mail
about the interview. Typical was this comment from Australia; "Israel has a true free
media. In Australia they ban opinions against the CFR and other hidden governors."
Wander noted, "I know, it's like the Rabin assassination, you were hushed up."
Was the interview deleted because I used salacious language
or made false accusations? My correspondence hints at nothing of the kind. Here is a
letter from an editor of the ZNS press service;
Hi Barry:
Shalom, and "todah rabah" for the link to your "Jerusalem Post" radio
interview. I found it fascinating for several reasons.
First, it was gratifying to me to hear you expose the CFR. You did a
magnificent job, especially considering the limited time available to you
on that show. You were superb!
Second, you packed more meat and potatoes into the few minutes available to
you than any other guest I've heard on radio. Your presentation was very,
very well organized, it never flagged, and you articulated your points
clearly.
Third, your familiarity with the past 50 years or so of international
political history was readily apparent. You came across to me as a
extremely intelligent, mature, level-headed, and dedicated
scholar-journalist. I salute you!
Again, many thanks for pointing me to your radio interview. Hearing your
voice and delivery style helped me think of you more as a real person, a
friend of mine in Israel.
If you know Rabbi Marvin Antelman, and if you could visit him, he could
show you his copy of my recent book, "Money -- Ye shall have honest weights
and measures." To find out more about "Money," visit
http://www.principiapub.com.
"Money" blows the whistle on the CFR but does
so only indirectly.
Shalom.
Best wishes,
Jim Ewart
So I'm hushed up, meanwhile, Sharon is determined to place two totally
corrupt politicos in his cabinet. Barak will soon face the music for approving an election
financing scam involving fleecing foreign donors through phoney charitable funds which
lined his back pocket, and Peres's central role in murdering Yitzhak Rabin will soon
become the country's scandal of the century.
And meanwhile, eight young men and women are murdered in a bus atrocity and
Hizbullah murders a soldier on patrol and our government exacts precisely no revenge.
And meanwhile, Arafat flies to Spain and Morocco last week, followed by a
snap visit to Israel by Spain's prime minister and our government hides the fact that its
decisions are being determined through Spain and the Vatican.
And meanwhile I am being fed information which I cannot yet confirm but which
you're going to get anyway. I'm told Clinton's Marc Rich pardon is leading in a most
unpleasant direction for him. Certain people tracing the extent of his bribes have
uncovered tantalizing hints that Clinton was about to receive a huge chunk of money from
an Arab oil account if he succeeded in getting Israel out of Judea and Samaria and East
Jerusalem before the end of his term.
And on Dec. 31/2000, the first conference on the Rabin assassination was held
in Jerusalem. I am told the event terrified our security establishment so much that they
decided to create a diversion so big, that it would sabotage the conference. The incident
was the murder of Binyamin Kahane and his wife Talya.
That's what I was told.
And now, for doing my best to save my dying nation, the Jerusalem Post has
deleted their radio interview with me. If you think that is unfair, their complaints dept.
can be reached at letters@jpost.co.il.
Look what that interview uncovered. Thanks to the courage of Josh Wander,
solid proof of Sharon's CFR connections emerged. Read this beauty:
http://www.foreignrelations.org/public/pubs/Sharon_1-24-01_Vid.html
General Meeting
Videoconference from Tel Aviv to New York and Washington, DC
Wednesday, January 24, 2001
"A Conversation with Ariel Sharon"
Ariel Sharon
Chairman, Israel's Likud Party
New York Presider:
Marilyn Berger
Journalist
Washington, DC Presider:
Judith Kipper
Director, Middle East Forum,
Council on Foreign Relations
Video Presentation
- To view these proceedings, you will need Windows Media Player 6.4 or higher, running on
a Windows 98, NT, or 2000 operating system. Mac versions are also available. You can download the player
for FREE.
- Play Video
Sharon - 56k
- Play Video
Sharon - 250k
- This meeting was on the record.
-
Website Guide | About the Council | Council
Highlights | Foreign Affairs Magazine | Council Publications | Search
| Home
Copyright 2001 by the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc.
All rights reserved.
YESSIREEE FOLKS, come one, come all and get your very own copy of Ariel
Sharon's CFR Show. Purchase your video from CFR Productions. It's fun for the whole family
and compact enough to fit in your purse. If you order right now, you will receive, at no
extra charge, our exciting video, Globalization And The Coming End Of Israel, starring
some of your favorite diplomatic puppets like Yossi Beilin, Ehud Barak, Binyamin
Netanyahu, our very own Henry Seigman and many, many more. Hurry because this offer only
lasts until Israel is demolished.
* * *
The author's book The Last Days Of Israel is available from Dandelion Books in the US.
Write cadler@mindspring.com. The new edition of Who Murdered Yitzhak Rabin is
available from Brookline Books. Write brooklinebks@delphi.com Both books are
available in Israel from the Zionist Book Club. Write perkins@netvision.net.il
or call 02 6712284. All books by the author are sold over amazon or barnesandnoble.
Please visit http://www.webseers.com/rabin
In March, the author will be on an American lecture tour which so far includes Brooklyn,
NY, Springfield, MO, Denver,CO, Salt Lake City, UT, Honolulu,HI and Dallas,TX. Interested
parties may contact the author to reach the organizers of the events. And apologies to his
faithful readers. There will be no updates for some 40 days beginning in early March.
February 14, 2001 - THE GUILT-RIDDEN JEWS OF THE
NEW WORLD ORDER
A couple of weeks back, Shimon Peres and Yasir
Arafat shared the
podium at the World Economic Conference in Davos, Switzerland. In
attendance was a Jewish journalist named Thomas Friedman. After Arafat
cursed Israel for half an hour and Peres shook his hand after the display
of venomous hatred, Friedman was so shocked that he told an Israeli
economics journalist, Stephan Plosker that, "You have no peace partner
until Arafat leaves the scene."
My, what a revelation from a New York Times Middle East
"expert" who
has spent two decades eroding Israel's position in the US!
That day, a true revelation appeared on an Israeli political site
www.debka.com. The writers there noted that it didn't
matter what Arafat
said or who witnessed it in the audience, the real business took place
behind the scenes "at the exclusive meetings of the Bilderberg group."
Yesterday, a few people sent me a TV listing from the US. It
seems
that CFR member Daniel Pipes, the author of two books on "conspiracy
theories," would be exposing, on a History Channel program, the paranoia of
those who believe organizations like,"The Skull and Bones Society, Council
On Foreign Relations and Bilderberg Group," are up to plots against the
people of the planet."
I have before me the latest membership list of the CFR; Pipes in
on it
and so is Thomas Friedman. To remind those who don't remember, during the
1980s, the New York Times sent two correspondents to Israel, David Shipler
and Thomas Friedman. Shipler came first and he was a far less talented
writer than his successor. However, he provided Friedman with most of his
contacts, many of whom were Israeli Uncle Toms like Rabbi David Hartman,
who liked the publicity and pandered to the reporters, telling them what
New York radical Liberals liked to hear.
Both Shipler and Friedman wrote books about their experiences as
NY
Times correspondents in Israel. Neither book had anything to do with the
actual country of Israel and Shipler's long forgotten volume was
atrociously written. But both journalists were awarded Pulitzer Prizes for
creating an Israel which uniformly despised the Likud leadership and longed
for close personal relationships with their Arab neighbors.
Friedman's book, From Beirut To Jerusalem, was far more damaging
than
Shipler's because it was readable. Within, Friedman created out of the
Middle East, a little New York, filled with fine people, all with
impeccably good hearts. With a little understanding and lots of Israeli
concessions, Lebanon could become another Long Island and Israel, the
Borough of Queens. The damage came because Friedman put all the onus on
Israel to be more charitable and was completely blind to the Medieval
savagery of the people Israel is stuck with as neighbors.
However, since the recent Davos meeting, Friedman is sorry he
wrote
all that stuff. At least that's what his fellow CFRer Daniel Pipes writes
in today's Jerusalem Post.
But let us wait before analyzing this "masterful"
apology. First, let
us look at the real world. By a coincidence, last night, I finished reading
a truly masterful work; Europe's Full Circle - Corporate Elites And The New
Fascism by British economic writer Rodney Atkinson. This is a sober expose
of the Bilderberg Group and its allies in the Royal Institute For
International Affairs in London and the Council On Foreign Relations in New
York. The author concludes that these groups are dedicated to completing
the economic plan of the Nazis and their Vatican compatriots, and in Europe
the means is the Maastricht Treaty. Allow me to quote Atkinson:
"The European
Union is based precisely on the social and
economic structures of
'The European Economic
Community' proposed by the Hitler regime
in 1941. The
covert and undemocratic
methods of forcing European rule on
Britain - through
Treaty law, directives
and regulations which largely bypass
parliament - had their
equivalent in the
emergency laws by which Hitler governed
Germany...The Treaty
Of Rome which brought
the European Community into being was
nurtured at
Bilderberg
meetings."
Atkinson is kind enough to present a list of those who attended
the
exclusive 1995 Bilderberg Conference on forced economic globalization and
guess who's name appears alongside Henry Kissinger and David Rockefeller?;
none other than NY Times Foreign Affairs columnist, Thomas Friedman!
Today CFRer Daniel Pipes, decided to bail out his fellow CFR
member,
who just happens to also be a Bilderberger, the distinguished journalist
Thomas Friedman. Now keeping in mind that Pipes is a proud conspiracy
debunker, how does he do it?
First he introduces his colleague, "Thomas Friedman may be
the
journalist who has the most influence on the way the outside world
understands the Arab-Israel conflict." Maybe true, but now we learn how he
views the issue; "His signature concept is applying a globalization theory
to the conflict." Ooh, could he have picked that up at his Bilderberg/CFR
meetings by some chance???
"If Arabs and Israelis would concentrate on fulfilling
the
imperatives of globalization, he argues, they would not only live better
but also find themselves too busy making money to hate each other." This
was not just Friedman's stupid idea but note, this is also Peres's New
Middle East and isn't it a cosy coincidence that both Peres and Friedman
were at Davos together this year?
It was this globalization concept of Peres and his partner
in crime
Yossi Beilin, that led them to handing the PLO 40,000 rifles and thus
turned both into accessories to mass murder. But Pipes forgives Friedman
his role in Israel's bloodletting because, "Of late, Friedman has woken up
to Middle Eastern realities." As if better late than never works out fine
this time around.
But that's okay, too because, "To his credit, Friedman
has candidly
acknowledged his mystification...Sadder but wiser, Thomas Friedman is
learning a deeper truth about the Middle East. This is one region where
politics trumps economics."
And so we end on an upbeat note. The world's number one
propagandizer
against Israel is sorry. He was wrong all along. And thanks to his Lodge
buddy Pipes, we're all going to thank him for changing his mind. Even those
Jews mourning their dead will be grateful because Friedman has seen the
light at last.
Back to Atkinson's Bilderberg list; what struck me was the
paucity of
Jewish Bilderberg members. The vast majority of members are from Northern
Europe. There are undoubtedly Jews who have lost their moral compass and
are plotting a world government based on the Nazi model but Friedman's
about-face leads to the conclusion that others were invited as dupes, to
promote an agenda they were too dim-witted to see through.
Which leads to a final question; when will Daniel Pipes get
a brain
and stop aiding his worst enemies?
***
February 12, 2001 - RABIN'S LAST DOCTOR AND THE
KNIGHTS TEMPLAR
We now enter the realm of the truly bizarre as we look at the doctor
who last examined Yitzhak Rabin, the State Pathologist, Dr. Yehuda Hiss. Israelis know too
well that their government's coroner is corrupt. In September 1999, Judge Ruth Orr
overturned a conviction against a Jewish resident of Judea and Samaria for the shooting
murder of an Arab boy because she accused Dr. Hiss of forging the forensic evidence
against him. It was the second time in a year that a murder conviction was overturned
because Hiss had falsified an autopsy for political purposes. He had earlier been caught
doctoring the facts to secure a wrongful rap against the parents of a murdered child.
His biggest fabrication of all occurred after the country's most
ghastly scandal was proven. In the first decade of Israel's existence, the Labor
government kidnapped over 4500 babies, mostly of new Yemenite immigrant parents, and sold
them off for adoption and medical experiments, mostly abroad. Through the efforts of
Yemenite groups fighting to expose this crime, three years ago one mother, Margalit
Omeisse was reunited with her daughter Celia Levine, given up for adoption to a California
couple almost half a century before. Besides looking like twins, the Hebrew University
genetics laboratory proved they were mother and daughter by DNA testing. Dr. Hiss retested
the two for the government and lo and behold, found that Hebrew University was wrong.
And that's why his nickname in certain circles is Dr. Coverup.
People started calling him that about a year after the Rabin
assassination. He conducted a partial autopsy of Rabin and concluded he was shot twice in
the back from medium range. In 1996, Rabin's hospital records were uncovered and over ten
doctors and nurses signed very different accounts of Rabin's demise. He was actually shot
three times, twice from point blank range and once frontally in the upper chest. On top of
that, Rabin's spine was shattered and Hiss categorically reported that it wasn't. Because
the patsy Yigal Amir never shot from point blank range or from the front, and because the
assassination film proved Rabin's spine could not have been broken since he kept right on
walking after the shot to his back, somebody must have asked Hiss to alter the medical
facts. So he did and then the government's commission of inquiry into the murder adopted
Hiss's lies as the official version of Rabin's death.
So we knew that Hiss was corrupt and that he molded his reports to fit
government orders. What we didn't know was that he is also genuinely ghoulish. Avi and
Nitzana (Darshan) Leitner are Yigal Amir's attorneys. They also represent another victim
of Dr. Hiss, the family of Alisdair Sinclair.
On April 14, 1998, 47 year old Alisdair Sinclair, was stopped by
customs officials at Ben Gurion Airport on his way out of the country after a six day
stay. They found 9000 Deutsche marks in a false bottom of his handbag and he was arrested
without charge. The police thought the false bottom suggested something illegal though
hiding a large amount of money is a legitimate means of thwarting theft.
At the airport police station, Sinclair was found strangling on his
shoelaces. He was rushed to hospital and pronounced dead. From there his body was
transferred to the Abu Kabir Institute For Forensic Medicine and straight into the paws of
Dr. Yehuda Hiss, who conducted an autopsy which concluded that Sinclair had killed
himself.
After that, there was a problem with the body. Sinclair was unmarried,
his parents weren't alive and he had been living a rather rootless life in Amsterdam
dealing in vintage guitars and strumming them at local pubs. It took three days to track
down his family in Scotland and the police offered to bury him in Israel. The family
refused and paid about $5000 to fly the corpse home.
On May 13, another autopsy was conducted, at the University of Glasgow
and guess what? The hyoid bone at the base of the tongue was missing and so was the heart.
Both were removed by Dr. Hiss. But why? No problem guessing why the hyoid bone was gone.
It would reveal that Sinclair did not hang himself but was strangled by other means.
But the heart..? Avi Leitner can only say, "Our best guess is that
Hiss is involved the the black market trade in human organs. We can't prove that yet, but
it seems the most likely motive for removing a healthy heart."
Incredibly, a most unlikely source provides an even spookier motive.
But let's get on with the story first.
The Sinclair family started investigating Alisdair's recent life and none of his friends
thought him remotely suicidal. Nor did they understand why he was arrested for carrying
perfectly legal currency in the first place. Israel police explained that they suspected
he was a drug dealer and under interrogation he admitted to have smuggled in thousands of
Ecstasy pills the week before, though he did not know who bought them. Alisdair's brother
James, of Selkirk, Scotland mocked the police version, noting accurately, that since he
wasn't caught with drugs, he had no reason whatsoever to confess to the supposed crime.
Enter the British government. Tel Aviv embassy official Suad Andraus
was furious, stating, "People don't just die in lockup." The British authorities
demand that Dr. Hiss explain what he did with the heart and then return it immediately.
Hiss explained that as a drug smuggling suspect, the heart would have
shown "signs of longterm drug abuse." Fine, so why didn't he return the heart
with the rest of the body? According to Hiss: "It's true we didn't inform the family
in Scotland that the heart was missing. Frankly, we didn't want to upset them."
How thoughtful, and returning the body without the heart wasn't in the
least bit upsetting???? Hiss complied to the second demand and turned over the heart to
the Sinclair family, or at least a heart. A not very convincing heart, at that. The
Sinclair Family demanded DNA proof that this was Alistair's heart but Dr. Hiss refused,
citing the $6000 cost of the test. The Sinclairs found the cost prohibitive as well but
this time, the British authorities did not press the issue or conduct their own tests.
A frustrated James Sinclair expressed his disgust with the
inconsistencies of his brother's strange demise.
"Alisdair never had a police record and it is unlikely that he
would turn to drug smuggling. And he repeats,"Why would he admit to anything if his
bloody suitcase was empty? My brother was an intelligent, well read man. He wasn't
daft."
Currently, the Israeli Police are conducting DNA tests and James is
awaiting the results, clearly unaware that if Dr. Yehuda "Coverup" Hiss has his
hands in the testing, the findings will be as honest as those of the Rabin assassination.
And now a most unexpected motive for the whole affair. It was published
in the Jerusalem Report, a staid, establishment newsmagazine which is used as a fount of
disinformation on behalf of the country's Labor Party. This peculiar passage may be of
interest to those questioning Britain's early and deep interest in Zionism, their
reverence for Chaim Weizmann, the Balfour Declaration, The British-Israel Society, the
Round Table policies of Cecil Rhodes and Lord Milner and the like.
"According to Alisdair's brother James, family lore has it that the Sinclairs are
descended from the crusading Knights Templars, who journeyed to Jerusalem in the mid-1300s
in search of holy artifacts from Herod's Temple to bring back to Scottish hero Robert
Bruce. Alisdair himself, says James, was particularly proud of his middle name, Roslyn,
the name of a chapel in Scotland whose floor plan is said to be based on Herod's Temple.
James mentions these details in attempting to reconstruct his brother's motive for
travelling to Israel."
How does this Medieval history explain Alisdair Sinclair's missing
heart? Researchers of the Templars present clues that may explain Hiss' ghoulish crime.
Let us begin with a marvelous history of the Knights Templar written by two Freemasons
Christopher Knight and Robert Lomas, called The Second Messiah. Summarized is their
history of the organization:
The Templars were a poor chivalric order which disdained materialism until
their arrival in Jerusalem in the early twelfth century on a papal crusade. Eleven knights
dug under the ruins of Solomon's Temple for nine years and hit paydirt. Under the Temple
Mount the Templars discovered a network of tunnels where the Jewish priests hid their
treasures from the marauding Romans in 70 AD. The knights not only uncovered some of the
gold and silver described in the Copper Scroll of the Dead Sea Scrolls but the records of
the first Jerusalem church of Christianity. This according to Knight and Lomas is
precisely what they went digging for.
The first Bishop of the Jerusalem Church was Jesus' brother James. He was
aided by Jesus' other siblings, five brothers and two sisters. After the Romans destroyed
Jerusalem and dispersed the Jews, James and his family fled to France, a fact confirmed by
the bestselling book Holy Blood, Holy Grail. These descendants of the holy Davidic line
had the wherewithal to gain wealth throughout Europe and buy vast properties. Over time
they constituted a good chunk of European royalty.
While professing whatever religion the state demanded, first worshiping
the pantheon of Roman Gods and later papal Christianity, they secretly practised the
Christianity of the early Jerusalem church. These descendants of the priestly line, now
called themselves Rex Deus, and passed on their traditions throughout the royal courts of
Europe where they ruled. The original Celt church was founded by the Rex Deus, and St.
Patrick of Ireland was a Jew. Other Rex Deus included the Habsburgs, the Stuarts of
Scotland and today's King Juan Carlos of Spain, who includes among his titles, Protector
Of The Holy Places Of Jerusalem.
The Templars returned from their Crusade with vast wealth
uncovered under the Temple Mount and initiated a monumental building program in Europe,
which ultimately resulted in the construction of over 250 castles and Gothic churches.
They now challenged the papacy for political control of Europe, yet the usually jealous
Vatican allowed their power to grow unabated. Knight and Lomas insist this is because the
Templars had a huge advantage over Rome.
According to their version of events, the Knights uncovered the
original records of the Jerusalem Church and they prove that Jesus was a prophet but not a
deity. His goal was to organize armed resistance to the Roman tyrants and re-establish an
independent Jewish nation. Lest my Christian readers object, it is more than a little
consolation knowing that Knight and Lomas are proud Freemasons and are promoting their own
Masonic agenda. There is no obligation to take them theologically at their word.
However, historically they are on solider ground because the rest of
their tale is mostly provable fact. In the fourteenth century, the French king known as
Philip the Fair coordinated a purge of the Templars in coordination with the Holy See.
Their properties were seized and their leader, in fact the last Templar leader, Jacques de
Molay was brutally tortured by crucifixion until he confessed to the sins of his Order. He
survived the first round of torture and a linen cloth was placed over him to absorb his
blood and keep him warm. This cloth became known as the Shroud of Turin and the authors
arguments for this claim are superbly grounded in fact.
A group of Templars led by the St. Clair clan escaped the French
siege by ship and landed in Scotland, a safe port since it was ruled by the Rex Deus
member, Robert the Bruce. It must be noted that at his death, Robert the Bruce's heart was
transported to Jerusalem for burial. Two versions of what happened to it exist. The first
says the deliverers of the heart were captured in Spain, the second insists they made it
and the heart lays buried in Jerusalem to this day.
An unpublished historian of the Templars, Daniel Leary notes:
"The name Sinclair comes from the hermit St. Clare or St. Clere,
who lived near the town that is now called St. Clair sur l'Epte, northwest of Paris,
France. Sinclair's ancestors took their surname from an abbey that was named after
the hermit, because that was the site where in the year 911 their ancestor Rollo the
Viking, signed the treaty with King Louis the Simple of France that created Rollo
hereditary Duke of the new Duchy of Normandy.
"Rollo's descendants included the nine St. Clare knights who accompanied
their cousin William the Conqueror (also a descendant of Rollo) to England in 1066. They
assisted his victory at the battle of Hastings, 14 Oct 1066. Many of them remained in
England.
"The Sinclairs played a prominent role in the history of the British Isles and
were particularly important in Scotland. Through marriage, their family became
related to the Bruces and the Stewarts. One of them, Henry St. Clair (1275-1336) both
fought at Bannockburn and signed the Declaration of Arbroath of 4 Apr 1320 from Scottish
nobles to the pope that declared Scottish independence."
According to Knight and Lomas, the French Templars brought with them the
damning scrolls from under the Jerusalem Temple Mount and built a chapel in Rosslyn, near
Edinburgh to house them. The chapel, built by William Sinclair (1415- 1482), which exists
today, was built according to the specifications of the Herodian Temple and an exact
duplicate of the Western Wall was constructed alongside it. To hide their now-banned
Templar roots, the Knights formed a new organization, Freemasonry, whose rites were
precisely those set down in the scrolls recovered from beneath Jerusalem's Temple Mount.
Scottish rite Masonry spread throughout Europe and according to Knight and
Lomas, much to the chagrin of the Vatican. In their version of events, in 1717, the
pro-Catholic Hanoverian dynasty took over the British crown and ordered vast changes in
Masonic rites. The 33 Scottish degrees were reduced to just four in the new English rites
and all the secrets within the Jerusalem scrolls were eliminated from lodge ceremonies.
However, other writers share a different version of events, insisting
the Templars and the Vatican remained partners throughout their public trials. F. Tupper
Saussy in his excellent book, Rulers Of Evil writes:
"On March 22, 1312, Clement V dissolved the Knights Templar with
his decree Vox clamantis. But the dissolution proved a mere formality to further appease
Philip (the Fair). More importantly, it permitted the Templars, in other manifestations to
continue enriching the papacy...A subtle provision in Vox clamantis transferred most
Templar estates to the Knights of St. John of Jerusalem. In Germany and Austria, the
Templars became "Rosicrucians" and "Teutonic Knights." Six centuries
later, as the "Teutonic Order," the Knights would provide the nucleus of Adolph
Hitler's political support in Munich and Vienna."
In his massive work Vatican Assassins, Eric Jon Phelps comes to
practically the same conclusion. In his version of events, the Jesuit Order infiltrated
Scottish Freemasonry in the sixteenth century and since then, the Templars have been doing
the work of the true ruler of the Vatican, the Supreme General of the Jesuits who both
Saussy and Phelps call, the Black Pope. Daniel Leary concurs on the Templar/Vatican
alliance.
"These 2nd sons of European gentry have had a long close relationship with Rome
and still act as the Vatican's bankers and intelligence operatives. Plus, they're current
membership includes a rouges gallery of modern intrigue, not the least of which being the
father of the US president elect, former president George Bush Sr..."
We now jump to 1993 and a "peace" process has begun between Israel and the
PLO.
In March 1994, the newspaper Chadashot revealed a most remarkable secret of the Middle
East "peace" process. A friend of Shimon Peres, the French intellectual Marek
Halter, claimed in an interview that in May 1993, he delivered a letter from Peres to the
pope. Within, Peres promised to internationalize Jerusalem, granting the UN political
control of the Old City of Jerusalem, and the Vatican hegemony of the holy sites within.
The UN would give the PLO a capital within its new territory and East Jerusalem would
become a kind of free trade zone of world diplomacy.
Halter's claim was backed by the Italian newspaper La Stampa which
added that Arafat was apprised of the agreement and it was included in the secret clauses
of the Declaration Of Principles signed in Washington in September 1993.
In March 1995, the Israeli radio station Arutz Sheva was leaked a cable from
the Israeli Embassy in Rome to Peres's Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem confirming the
handover of Jerusalem to the Vatican. This cable was printed on the front page of the
radical leftwing Israeli newspaper, Haaretz two days later. A scandal erupted and numerous
rabbis who had invited Peres for Passover services cancelled their invitations in protest
of his treachery. Peres reacted by claiming that the cable was real but that someone had
whited out the word, "not;" the cable really said that Israel would
"not" hand Jerusalem over to the holy pontiff.
Illustrating the sorry political state of Israel's rabbis, they
accepted this cockamamie excuse and re-invited Peres to their tables. However, in the
widely distributed minutes of a meeting with Clinton in 1997, Peres reiterated his
diplomacy, ending with the words, "as I had previously promised the Holy See."
Peres's partner in crime, and the real founder of the Oslo Accord,
Yossi Beilin, coordinated his PLO policy with the Vatican. Check the timing; at the same
moment that he was finagling an accord with the PLO, he was negotiating an agreement for
Vatican recognition of Israel. His deal with the pope became another brief scandal when
politicians like Agudat Yisrael head Avraham Shapira and Jerusalem Deputy Mayor, Shmuel
Meir were leaked hidden details of Beilin's accord which included, "the
extra-territoriality of holy sites in Jerusalem to be transferred to Vatican
control." Later, Shapira was neutralized by having $250 million is debts accrued by
his crooked carpet factory forgiven, while Meir was permanently hushed when his car was
crushed by a UN truck driven by a PLO driver. The driver, of course, was released forever
after being briefly questioned by Israel Police.
By 2001, the current Foreign Minister Shlomo Ben Ami was shuttling between
King Carlos of Spain and the Vatican. That is where the action is for the Israeli
government today, and when things get serious, the focus shifts to Paris where Chirac, the
US Secretary of State and Arafat await him.
There is no question whatsoever that the Vatican wants Israel off the Temple
Mount and that the Israeli leadership is accommodating their desire. But the PLO has
plans of its own. By the summer of 2000, they began digging under the Temple Mount in
earnest. Originally they claimed they were simply expanding a mosque under Solomon's
Stables, beneath the Damascus Gate of Jerusalem's walled Old City. However, the huge
mounds of earth and artifacts from the Second Temple that were being dumped in nearby
wadis betrayed a much more extensive plan.
On January 26, 2001, the Israeli government's television outlet,
Channel One, broadcast a video clip secretly filmed under the Shrine of Omar, the 7th
century Islamic building which may have been deliberately constructed over the Holy of
Holies, the most sacred prayer room of the ancient Temple. The video revealed a new and
massive tunnel aimed directly at the most sacred core of Solomon's and later, Herod's
Temples.
The PLO are after not only the treasures buried beneath the Temple to
deplete their morally and financially bankrupt regime of terror but must be looking for
more scrolls that can be used to blackmail the Vatican and thus get their way in world
diplomacy.
The Vatican is terrified that the Jews will uncover the truth under the
Temple, whatever it may be. It is essential for them that Israel is removed from the Holy
Mount. And they are not alone in this desire. Now we come full circle to Alisdair
Sinclair's heart.
On Jan. 4, 2001, Colin Grant published a full front page expose of the
scandal in the Glasgow Sunday Post. He revealed that the Knights Templar, as descendents
the Davidic line believe they have a right to reclaim the Temple Mount as their rightful
heritage:
"A spokesman for Militi Templi Scotia, the Scottish Knights
Templar admitted to the Sunday Post, 'We are currently involved in an attempt to remove
control of the holy sites from the Israeli government. We believe they should be
administered by the United Nations and are working with the UN and NATO to achieve that
goal.'"
A secret Medieval battle over the Temple Mount is being conducted in
Israel today and unless it can be stopped, this skirmish has the potential of dragging the
whole planet into war.
end
February 9, 2001 - No Reason To Celebrate Sharon's
Victory
My message, to those who respect it, is clear. The Israeli political
leadership has been corrupted from abroad and no one running for Prime
Minister is exempt. And that includes Ariel Sharon above all. I can
understand the widespread celebration of his unprecedented rout of Ehud
Barak. Finally, those elements determined to drag Israel into a suicidal
pact with the PLO have been given a resounding message that the people have
had it with them. As a temporary relief valve this election served a most
therapeutic function. Unfortunately too many people think Sharon's victory
means the war has been won and they are about to be very disappointed
because Sharon will betray them just as much as Barak did. Only the style
will change.
Here's how we got the elections in the first place. On a
Wednesday six
weeks ago, Binyamin Netanyahu was in the middle of a lucrative American
speaking tour. There, he met two members of the Council On Foreign
Relations (CFR), George Shultz and Henry Kissinger. In Netanyahu's own
words, they told him the time was right to run for prime minister; a very
noble message except elections weren't planned for another two years.
Netanyahu then hopped on a plane to Israel, he claimed to attend
a Bat
Mitzvah, had a few words with Barak and flew back to America to continue
his lectures. Two days later Barak, who Kissinger and gang put in power
beginning with a New York meeting in May 1995, resigned and called for
elections in which he would remain a candidate.
Now why would he do such an insane thing unless told to? He was
losing
badly in the polls and began the race in a hopeless position. Then he
continued with a campaign guaranteed to get him trounced at the polls. The
CFR determined that it was Sharon's turn to drag Israel into war. Barak had
prepared the path and now Sharon would lead the war. And the world and its
Jews, getting dumber by the day, believe that all these events will be
explained by random actions.
A few years back I received a phone call from New York from Joel
Bainerman, who was attending an Israeli economic conference at the Sheraton
Hotel in Manhattan. Excited, he said, "I was walking through a hall and
guess who I saw come out of a conference room? Sharon and Kissinger." Joel
told the same story to journalists covering the conference and at the next
morning's press conference Sharon confirmed the meeting adding that, "In
order to achieve peace, concessions will have to be made." He was asked if
he meant territorial concessions and he refused to answer. Kissinger's talk
had moulded the man.
Meanwhile, I called Sharon's spokesman Raanan Gissen and asked him what
was discussed at the meeting. He replied, "They met to discuss overall
Middle East security issues." I asked why Sharon, the Infrastructure
Minister should be discussing security matters at a trade conference. He
answered, "You're right, of course. They were discussing economic matters."
I persisted, "Why was Sharon meeting Kissinger in the first place?" The
reply was boggling; "Minister Sharon has met Mr. Kissinger every time he
has flown to America since the end of the Yom Kippur War."
This was way too much to digest so quickly. I blurted out, "What
do you
know about Kissinger's leadership in the Council On Foreign Relations?"
Gissen paused and answered, "Mr. Sharon has left instructions that this
topic will only be discussed when he writes his diplomatic memoirs."
Ariel Sharon was born and raised on a radical-Left Mapai moshav, Kfar
Malal. In early 1973 he quit the IDF and formed a political party,
Shlomzion, whose followers were anticipated to be from the Left. Sharon
even invited the extremist Yossi Sarid to join him in the party leadership.
In October of the same year, war broke out and Sharon emerged the national
hero. Now his political career would rise and the CFR decided that he had
to be on their side.
He met with Kissinger and his proteges in early 1974 and received
their power and blessings for a rise to the top, but with conditions. The
first was that he become a mole in the Israeli Right and that he destroy
the Herut movement. He returned to Israel, built up his party and proposed
a united Right wing party to run in the 1977 elections. He amalgamated the
Liberal (Gahal) Party with his own and Herut to create the Likud.
The election of the honorable and independent Likud leader
Menachem
Begin sent the CFR into a tizzy and Sharon was called on to neutralize and
ultimately remove him. Before that could be done, Begin was outflanked by
Egyptian leader Anwar Sadat and with all the power of the CFR behind the
Egyptian position, Begin relented and withdrew from the entire Sinai
Peninsula. The withdrawal could only proceed because Sharon was leading it.
When one stubborn town, Yamit refused to be obliterated, Sharon sent in the
bulldozers to do the job, one reason he is known as "the bulldozer," and a
better reason to fear his real policy on uprooting Jewish homes.
On June 6, 1982, my army unit entered the Lebanon War.
Following a
trail of battles, we finally arrived at our position on Jebel Barauch, high
in the Chouf Mountains, 80 km. from the safety of the Israeli border. We
gathered around the tv set for the evening news and we heard Defence
Minister Sharon's lie to Begin that the troops would stop advancing once
they had reached the 40 km. line in Lebanon. We were stunned. The nation
and its Prime Minister were being given a totally false picture of the war
by Sharon. We all asked why and no answer was satisfactory.
A decade later Joel Bainerman and I spent an afternoon
interviewing
Menachem's son, Benny Begin. He was very coy with the facts we sought but,
nonetheless, provided vital testimony. His father's war had been fought
mostly to reverse a deal reached by Kissinger, Rabin and Syrian President
Assad in 1975. Assad wanted Israel off the Golan Heights, Rabin couldn't
deliver so Kissinger came up with a neat idea. Syria wanted Lebanon just as
much, so let's give her it. We'll ignite a civil war and Israel will allow
Syrian troops in to bring peace.
Benny Begin recalled. "Rabin laughed when he told this story
and I
said, 'Why are you so happy, 300,000 people died in that war?' He smiled
and answered. 'Don't worry, it was a good deal.'" Menachem Begin's goal was
to reverse the Middle East of murder organized by the CFR and Sharon's task
was to stop him.
Benny Begin stressed one point without adding the precise details
we
sought; Sharon deliberately ousted his father from office.
We now recall the 1983 massacre at the Sabra and Shatilla refugee
camps. On a Friday morning, Sharon gave permission for Phalangist forces to
eliminate remaining PLO snipers in the camps. The Phalangists had been
victimized by savage PLO massacres and Sharon must have known how they
would react if given a free hand to operate in the camps. Word of the
massacre reached him by the night but he did not order the Phalangists
removed for two more days. Sharon suffered a temporary career setback for
his negligence but this was the beginning of the end of Menachem Begin.
Sharon has been a magnificent performer, building on his deserved
reputation as a daring commander, since 1974 he has been the darling of the
Right. And since his rise, the Right has been slowly disintegrating. When
Netanyahu was ordered by his CFR masters to sign the upcoming Wye
Agreement, which gave the PLO more territory than Rabin or Peres ever
handed over, both they and he understood that a huge ploy was needed to
prevent massive protest against the outrage. So Netanyahu appointed Sharon
his Foreign Minister, and barely a week later, Sharon gave his seal of
approval to Wye. How could anyone protest when the militant, darling of the
Right authorized all its clauses?
Early on during the recent election campaign, numerous Israeli
journalists wrote that Shimon Peres and Sharon were plotting against Barak.
The goal this time, was to have Sharon's buddy Peres replace Barak as the
Labor candidate.
However, Barak caught on and fought back with the strongest
weapon in
his arsenal; Peres's organization of the Rabin assassination. The far left
Meretz Party was about to back a motion led by Yossi Sarid, to make Peres
their candidate for the elections. Their central council was all ready to
approve Peres when according to Yediot Ahronot, "Rabin sent a messenger to
remind the council members about Yitzhak Rabin." Meretz then changed its
mind about Peres. The media speculated that Barak reminded the Meretz
members that Peres snitched on Rabin about an illegal bank account in 1977
that drove him from office or that Rabin called Peres, "a relentless
conniver," as if those facts weren't known and that they could turn the
party against Peres.
Despite the Meretz rejection, Peres called out all his forces,
especially in the media, to mount a campaign to replace Barak with him.
Then Barak appeared on a morning radio show on Reshet Bet and said that if
Peres didn't stop his campaign, he was going to talk to the Rabin family
about the assassination. Peres's campaign to replace Barak came to a
grinding halt.
Every available Saturday afternoon, for over twenty years, Sharon
and
Peres meet at Peres's home for what they call "social visits." At Peres's
75th birthday party, Sharon was placed in the seat of honor beside him.
They are the closest of friends and their "vicious" rivalry over the years
has been brilliantly stage managed.
Do not be surprised if the happy couple come out of the closet
and
into the Knesset. If Sharon has his way, Peres will be his Foreign
Minister. Yes, he knows about Rabin, all the insiders do. So Sharon will
fight any legal action which could bring justice to the memory of Rabin by
trying his real murderers. He'll protect his buddy Shimon with all the
considerable powers he has just received.
And Israel will go to war under Sharon, not because of him, he is just
the right "hard-line, militant" pawn to justify bloody violence against the
Jewish nation, but because the real powers who rule this planet have
planned it that way all along.
***
>The author's book The Last Days Of Israel is available from Dandelion
>Books in the US. Write cadler@mindspring.com.
The new edition of Who
>Murdered Yitzhak Rabin is available from Brookline Books.
>Write brooklinebks@delphi.com
Both books are available in Israel from
>the Zionist Book Club. Write perkins@netvision.net.il
or call 02
>6712284. All books by the author are sold over amazon or barnesandnoble.
>Please visit http://www.webseers.com/rabin
In March, the author will be
>on an American lecture tour which so far includes Silver Springs, MD.,
>Brooklyn, NY, Springfield, MO, Denver,CO, Salt Lake City, UT and
>Dallas,TX. Interested parties may contact the author to reach the
>organizers of the events.
|